Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare and evaluate facemask effects when two types of intraoral appliances were used for maxillary protraction for patients with class III malocclusion. Eighteen patients with class III malocclusion were treated with a facemask for an average of 12 months. Two types of intraoral appliances were used: nine patients were treated with bonded expander (Group 1), and nine patients with Hyrax (Group 2). Cephalometric radiographs were taken before and after treatment. Cephalometric radiographs were traced, analyzed, and the results such as sagittal, vertical and soft-tissue changes were compared between two groups. The amount of anchorage loss was also measured to evaluate the difference between two groups. All patients showed significant sagittal skeletal changes after treatment, and there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. When anchorage loss was evaluated, no differences were shown between the two. Facemask with Hyrax or bonded expander is similarly an effective method as a treatment in class III malocclusion patients.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: THE JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN ACADEMY OF PEDTATRIC DENTISTRY
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
