Abstract

Modern face transplant techniques have advanced to allow for the transfer of vascularized skeletal components in addition to overlying soft tissue. This represents significant opportunity for individuals with mandibular defects that are not amenable to traditional reconstruction. Care must be taken when planning and executing transplants with these complex grafts, as satisfactory functional and aesthetic outcomes rely on achieving proper spatial relationships between the mandible, skull base, and midface. Which donor skeletal elements are included in the allograft and how they are harvested are important considerations in this planning and are associated with controversy. To optimize outcomes in the reconstruction of single-jaw defects, some advocate for transplantation of only the affected jaw while others support bimaxillary transplantation. Clinical evidence in this debate is not conclusive at this time. In current practice, including donor dentoalveolar anatomy by utilizing a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible is favored to optimize outcomes such as dental occlusion. It has been suggested that harvesting the mandible at the level of the condyle or even the temporal bone may also be possible and may improve temporomandibular joint-related outcomes. Despite encouraging preclinical evidence, these strategies remain controversial. After allograft design, successful mandibular reconstruction with face transplantation relies on surgical precision in the donor and recipient procedures. Computerized surgical planning, computer-aided design and manufacturing, and intraoperative navigation are technologies currently in use to mitigate operative complexity. Results in both cadaveric and clinical face transplantations suggest these technologies are reliable and beneficial, although some room for improvement remains.

Highlights

  • Face transplantation offers significant aesthetic and functional improvements for patients with devastating injuries that cannot be managed with conventional reconstruction[1,2,3]

  • Modern face transplantation represents a powerful tool for surgeons seeking to reconstruct massive facial defects involving the mandible

  • Et al.[4] reported two bimaxillary transplants facilitated by computerized surgical planning (CSP), CAD/CAM, and intraoperative navigation that both resulted in adherence to the virtual surgical plan and class I occlusion following transplantation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Face transplantation offers significant aesthetic and functional improvements for patients with devastating injuries that cannot be managed with conventional reconstruction[1,2,3]. This review seeks to define some of the important considerations in the surgical planning of facial allografts involving the mandible as well as to highlight some of the emerging technologies available to optimize patient outcomes in these cases.

Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.