Abstract
We investigated the performance of three face verification algorithms (correlation filters, Individual PCA, and FisherFaces) on an image database collected by a cell phone camera. Cell phone camera images tend to be of poorer quality along with experiencing scale and dynamic illumination changes due to cell phone portability. While Individual PCA and FisherFaces work in the image domain, correlation filters work in the frequency domain and offer advantages such as shift-invariance, the ability to accommodate in-class image variability, and closed-form expressions. Verification results suggest that, with this database, correlation filters can offer a better performance than Individual PCA and comparable performance with FisherFaces with fewer filters.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews)
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
