Abstract

BackgroundTwo established scores, the Mainz Severity Score Index (MSSI) and Fabry Disease Severity Scoring System (DS3), quantify the disease burden in Fabry disease (FD), while the recent developed FAbry STabilization indEX (FASTEX) aims to detect disease progression. ObjectiveMSSI, DS3 and FASTEX were compared to evaluate disease stability or progression in a prospective cohort of Fabry patients under enzyme replacement therapy (ERT). MethodsDisease load of 62 patients (28 [45%] females) treated with ERT (26 [42%] under agalsidase-alfa) was assessed using the current scores and re-assessed after 12 months of treatment. Fifteen (24%) patients were ERT-naïve at baseline. ResultsAll scores showed a correlation with each other, while MSSI and DS3 showed the strongest (Pearson r: 0.81, p < .0001). Plasma lyso-Gb3 levels in naïve patients correlated with increasing DS3 and MSSI scores (Pearson r: 0.60, p < .05; Pearson r: 0.64, p < .01; respectively), but not with the total weighted FASTEX score. Longitudinal analysis suggested a stable disease course using DS3 and MSSI. Only males long-term-treated with agalsidase-alfa presented with a slight increase of the general MSSI score (p = .0084). By contrast, the FASTEX score demonstrates that only 21 patients (33.9%) were stable, all other patients presented a disease progression. Patients with an unstable FASTEX mainly suffered from a significant loss of renal function (eGFRcreat: −2.7 ± 7.3 ml/min/1.73 m2, p = .0298). ConclusionWe conclude that the FASTEX seems to be a simple and user friendly, valuable tool to assess early changes in disease progression even in smaller patient cohorts and short term surveillance.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call