Abstract

The aim being to fabricate (1 1 0) localized silicon-on-insulator (L-SOI) devices, we have first of all completed the Semicond. Sci. Technol. 23 105018 (2008) study of the differences between (1 1 0) and (1 0 0) surfaces in terms of (i) HCl etch kinetics and (ii) SiGe growth kinetics (with a chlorinated chemistry). The core layers of a L-SOI device are indeed obtained thanks to the in situ HCl etching (on patterned wafers) of the Si active areas followed by the selective epitaxial growth of a Si0.7Ge0.3/Si stack. Given that SiGe(1 1 0) layers grown at 650 °C in windows of patterned wafers are rough, we have first of all studied the 600 °C growth kinetics of SiGe(1 1 0). As expected, the SiGe growth rate decreases as the growth temperature decreases from 650 °C down to 600 °C (irrespective of the surface orientation). The SiGe(1 0 0) growth rate increases linearly with the germane mass flow. Meanwhile, the SiGe(1 1 0) growth rate increases in a sub-linear fashion and then saturates at much lower values than on (1 0 0). The Ge concentration x dependence on the F(GeH4)/F(SiH2Cl2) mass flow ratio is parabolic on (1 0 0) and linear on (1 1 0), with lower values on the latter than on the former. We have then used those data to fabricate (1 0 0) and (1 1 0) L-SOI structures. The high HCl partial pressure recessing of the Si(1 1 0) and Si(1 0 0) active areas was performed at 675 °C and 725 °C, respectively. An increase of both the Si(1 1 0) HCl etch rate and the SiGe growth rate (be it at 650 °C on (1 0 0) or at 600 °C on (1 1 0)) was noticed when switching from blanket to patterned wafers (factors of 2.5–3 for HCI and 1.5 for SiGe). Finally, Si(1 1 0) growth times were multiplied by 4/3 compared to the Si(1 0 0) growth time in order to obtain similar thickness Si caps. Subsequent process steps were very similar on (1 0 0) and (1 1 0). Almost the same etch rates were notably obtained for the lateral etching of the (1 1 0) and (1 0 0) SiGe sacrificial layers (thanks to a CF4-based dry plasma), with no anisotropy. Significant hole mobility gains (electron mobility loss) compared to the universal Si(1 0 0)/SiO2 mobility were evidenced in long, narrow (L = 10 µm; W = 0.08 µm) ‘bulk-like’ epitaxial Si(1 1 0) L-SOI devices (i.e. with SiGe still present under most of the Si channel). The gain (the loss) monotonically increased from 120% (11%) up to 246% (58%) when moving away from the [0 0 1] direction toward the [1 −1 0] direction (not reached, however: at most at 60° to [0 0 1]). Vastly improved hole transport properties (a factor of 2 On current increase) were evidenced in short dimensions L-SOI devices (L = 0.35 µm; W = 0.08 µm) when switching from (1 0 0) surfaces with ⟨1 1 0⟩ conduction channels to (1 1 0) surfaces with a [0 0 1] propagation direction for the holes.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.