Abstract

BackgroundEvidence from meta-analyses of randomised clinical trials show interventions for young people at ultra high risk (UHR) of developing psychosis are effective both clinically and economically. While research evidence has begun to be integrated into clinical guidelines, there is a lack of research on the implementation of these guidelines. This paper examines service provision for UHR individuals in accordance with current clinical guidelines within the National Health Service (NHS) in England.MethodsA self-report online survey was completed by clinical leaders of Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) teams (N=50) within the NHS across the UK.ResultsOf the 50 EIP teams responding (from 30 NHS Trusts), 53% reported inclusion of the UHR group in their service mandate, with age range predominantly 14–35 years (81%) and service provided for at least 12 months (53%). Provision of services according to NICE clinical guidelines showed 50% of services offered cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for psychosis, and 42% offered family intervention. Contrary to guidelines, 50% of services offered antipsychotic medication. Around half of services provided training in assessment by CAARMS, psycho-education, CBT for psychosis, family work and treatment for anxiety and depression.DiscussionDespite clear evidence for the benefit of early intervention in this population, current provision for UHR within EIP services in England does not match clinical guidelines. While some argue this is due to a lack of allocated funding, it is important to note the similar variable adherence to clinical guidelines in the treatment of people with established schizophrenia.

Highlights

  • Neurocognitive impairments are a major feature of schizophrenia and present long-term challenges to the quality of life (QOL) of patients

  • This study sought to better characterise the neurocognitionsQOL relationship through 3 separate analyses in clinical and healthy control samples: 1) examining correlational relationships between oQOL and sQOL and both lower-order and executive cognitive skills; 2) examining if lowerorder or executive cognitive skills moderate the relationship between oQOL and sQOL; and 3) examining if the relationship between sQOL and both lower-order and executive cognitive skills differs between groups

  • In line with the literature, the results revealed significant correlations between oQOL and sQOL but no associations between sQOL and either cognition measure in both groups (Analysis 1)

Read more

Summary

Poster Session II

F251. REVISITING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN NEUROCOGNITION AND SUBJECTIVE QUALITY OF LIFE IN SCHIZOPHRENIA Eric Tan*,1, Stuart Lee2, Susan Rossell3 1Swinburne University; 2Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, The Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Central Clinical School; 3Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, The Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Central Clinical School, Swinburne University of Technology, The University of Melbourne, St. Vincent’s Hospital

Background
Findings
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call