Abstract

BackgroundA central theme of contemporary neuroscience is the notion that the brain embodies a generative model of its sensory inputs to infer on the underlying environmental causes, and that it uses hierarchical prediction errors (PEs) to continuously update this model. In two pharmacological EEG studies, we investigate trial-wise hierarchical PEs during the auditory mismatch negativity (MMN), an electrophysiological response to unexpected events, which depends on NMDA-receptor mediated plasticity and has repeatedly been shown to be reduced in schizophrenia.MethodsStudy1: Reanalysis of 64 channel EEG data from a previously published MMN study (Schmidt et al., 2012) using a placebo-controlled, within-subject design (N=19) to examine the effect of S-ketamine. Study2: 64 channel EEG data recorded during MMN (between subjects, double-blind, placebo-controlled design, N=73), to examine the effects of amisulpride and biperiden. Using the Hierarchical Gaussian Filter, a Bayesian learning model, we extracted trial-by-trial PE estimates on two hierarchical levels. These served as regressors in a GLM of trial-wise EEG signals at the sensor level.ResultsWe find strong correlations of EEG with both PEs in both samples: lower-level PEs show effects early on (Study1: 133ms post-stimulus, Study2: 177ms), higher-level PEs later (Study1: 240ms, Study2: 450ms). The temporal order of these signatures thus mimics the hierarchical relationship of the PEs, as proposed by our computational model, where lower level beliefs need to be updated before learning can ensue on higher levels. Ketamine significantly reduced the representation of the higher-level PE in Study1. (Study2 has not been unblinded.)DiscussionThese studies present first evidence for hierarchical PEs during MMN and demonstrate that single-trial analyses guided by a computational model can distinguish different types (levels) of PEs, which are differentially linked to neuromodulators of demonstrated relevance for schizophrenia. Our analysis approach thus provides better mechanistic interpretability of pharmacological MMN studies, which will hopefully support the development of computational assays for diagnosis and treatment predictions in schizophrenia.

Highlights

  • Variation in trajectories of Ultra high-risk (UHR) psychosis mental state posts challenge to schizophrenia prevention or onset delay intervention

  • There were no between-group differences in socio-demographic or clinical characteristics (Tab 1.) Participants did not differ on working memory (WM) task performance during online tDCS (Tab 2)

  • This is the first tDCS study to examine the brain activity during WM and EF assessment in individuals with schizophrenia using fMRI This data suggests that biasing the membrane potential of neuronal populations in the frontal cortex seems to improve their response to other inputs i.e. decreased BOLD activation in the WM and EF network

Read more

Summary

Results

We find strong correlations of EEG with both PEs in both samples: lower-level PEs show effects early on (Study1: 133ms post-stimulus, Study2: 177ms), higher-level PEs later (Study1: 240ms, Study2: 450ms). The temporal order of these signatures mimics the hierarchical relationship of the PEs, as proposed by our computational model, where lower level beliefs need to be updated before learning can ensue on higher levels. Ketamine significantly reduced the representation of the higher-level PE in Study. (Study has not been unblinded.) Discussion: These studies present first evidence for hierarchical PEs during MMN and demonstrate that single-trial analyses guided by a computational model can distinguish different types (levels) of PEs, which are differentially linked to neuromodulators of demonstrated relevance for schizophrenia. Our analysis approach provides better mechanistic interpretability of pharmacological MMN studies, which will hopefully support the development of computational assays for diagnosis and treatment predictions in schizophrenia. Ye Tian*,1, Chad Bousman, Chenxing Liu, Christos Pantelis, Andrew Zalesky3 1The University of Melbourne; 2University of Calgary; 3The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre

Background

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.