Abstract
BackgroundViolence towards mental health care workers, and towards physicians in general, is a common occupational hazard. The goal of this work was to determine to what extent violence escalates to actual homicides, both for mental health workers and for physicians in general. Characteristics of the victims, the perpetrators and of the methods of homicide were examined in order to formulate recommendations for violence assessment and safety measures in healthcare settings.MethodsA systematic search for accounts describing homicides of mental health workers between 1981 and 2014, and for physicians between 1981 and 2017 was conducted. Cases of homicides committed by patients, family members of patients, and co-workers of the victims were included. Cases of homicide that occurred in correctional setting, or in agencies not focused on health care (such as child protective services) were excluded. News outlet accounts, internet sources, and the medical literature was searched for details of these cases. Data that were extracted included demographic details on victims and perpetrators, scene and method of homicide, presence of psychiatric diagnoses and prior treatment, and disposition of the perpetrators.ResultsResults obtained for mental health workers has been published previously1. Thirty-three homicides of mental health workers were found and examined. Young women caseworkers who were unaccompanied during visits to residential treatment facilities were the most common victims. Men with a diagnosis of schizophrenia were the most common perpetrators. The most likely method of homicide was gunshot. Perpetrators often had a prior history of violence, criminal charges, involuntary hospitalization and nonadherence to medications. Thirty cases of homicides of physicians were found and examined. Psychiatry was the single most likely specialty of the victims (37%). Most homicides occurred in physician offices (33%). The most common psychiatric diagnosis of the perpetrators was schizophrenia (17%), but many other diagnoses were identified, and 33% of perpetrators could not be assigned a diagnosis. The most common method of homicide was again by gunshot.DiscussionHomicides of mental health workers, and of physicians generally, are rare events that emerge from a background of common aggression and violence in healthcare settings. Many of these homicides may have been preventable. Strategies to identify violence risk and to train acute care staff in possible prevention measures, as well as some policy and training measures will be discussed.
Highlights
Stigma toward mental illness may lead to delayed detection, impaired treatment adherence, and poorer recovery
Assuming certain MR assumptions are met, our results provide evidence of a bi-directional causal association between neuroticism and schizophrenia suggesting a genetic overlap rather than a uni-directional casual association, the impact of feedback loops between exposure and outcome cannot be addressed
Compounded by an intriguing feature, psychotic-like experience with no apparent impact on functioning, we wonder if people will generalize their prejudice and discrimination towards schizophrenia to subjects with subthreshold psychotic symptoms
Summary
The IVW MR method provided strong evidence of a casual effect of genetically instrumented neuroticism on risk of schizophrenia (p < 0.001). This causal association was evident when using the median weighted approach (p = 0.004) but evidence was weaker when using the weighted mode (p = 0.719) and MR Egger approaches (p = 0.439). There was evidence of a causal effect of schizophrenia on neuroticism (IVW p = 0.001, weighted median p = 0.017, weighted mode p = 0.018) again, the I2GX statistic indicated potential violation of the no measurement error MR assumption. Chen-Chung Liu*,1, Yen-Chin Wang2 1National Taiwan University Hospital and College of Medicine, National Taiwan University; 2National Taiwan University Hospital
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.