Abstract

This article addresses the way the book of Ezra-Nehemiah on one hand and Chronicles on the other reflect the relationship between Samaria and Judah in the postexilic period. With regard to Ezra-Nehemiah, the focus is placed on Ezra 4:1–5, 6–23, 24, which evokes a particular image of the nature of the relationship between Samaria and Judah within the report of the construction of the temple in Ezra 1–6 that can function paradigmatically for the book as a whole. With regard to Chronicles, the focus lies on the theme of cult centralization, which became established in a particular manner through the reception of earlier tradition. The article concludes that both works, each in its own way, call forth critique of Samaria and the Samaritans in order to establish a separate Judean or Jewish group identity. The critique of the two works is dated to the late fourth or early third centuries BCE. As such, both are reckoned among the first witnesses heralding a shift in the perception of Samaria in biblical literature, namely toward a polemical and unequivocally negative perspective attested later in, for example, Josephus.

Highlights

  • Biblical traditions and texts do not mirror the historical realities of the times of their composition or redactional editing through the medium of the text

  • The texts often evoke a caricature of the Gerizim community, defaming them as a sect and as foreign1 —a caricature that the Samaritans have contrived for their Jewish sister community

  • My thesis is that Chronicles differs markedly from the depiction of Samaria undertaken by Ezra-Nehemiah, Chronicles is still quite polemic towards the Samari(t)ans

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Biblical traditions and texts do not mirror the historical realities of the times of their composition or redactional editing through the medium of the text. Scholarship primarily sees historical references to confrontations with the province of Samaria in the early phase of the restoration in the complications surrounding the building of the temple in Ezra 4:1–5 and 4:6–23(24). The depiction of conflict between the Samarians and Judeans is considerably more complex in Chronicles, whose literary origins lie either in the late Persian or the early Hellenistic period.. Since the 1960s, scholars have viewed Chronicles as a work independent from Ezra-Nehemiah Important work supporting this argument came from Willi (1972); Williamson (1977); Braun (1977); Japhet (1993, 1997, 2013, 2002–2003). My thesis is that Chronicles differs markedly from the depiction of Samaria undertaken by Ezra-Nehemiah, Chronicles is still quite polemic towards the Samari(t)ans. Chronicles develops a contemporary distinction with regard to Samaria in the example of cult centralization.

Ezra 4:1–5
Ezra 4:6–24
On the Origins of the Text of Ezra 4:1–24 and a Historical Contextualization
Chronicles’Exclusive Interpretation of Cult Centralization
Judean Orthopraxy
Cult Centraliziation as Conditio sine qua non for the Description of Israel
Between Continuity and Separation
From Literature to “Reality”: Defining “Israel”
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call