Abstract

In conditions of constant illumination, the eye pupil diameter indexes the modulation of arousal state and responds to a large breadth of cognitive processes, including mental effort, attention, surprise, decision processes, decision biases, value beliefs, uncertainty, volatility, exploitation/exploration trade-off, or learning rate. Here, I propose an information theoretic framework that has the potential to explain the ensemble of these findings as reflecting pupillary response to information processing. In short, updates of the brain’s internal model, quantified formally as the Kullback–Leibler (KL) divergence between prior and posterior beliefs, would be the common denominator to all these instances of pupillary dilation to cognition. I show that stimulus presentation leads to pupillary response that is proportional to the amount of information the stimulus carries about itself and to the quantity of information it provides about other task variables. In the context of decision making, pupil dilation in relation to uncertainty is explained by the wandering of the evidence accumulation process, leading to large summed KL divergences. Finally, pupillary response to mental effort and variations in tonic pupil size are also formalized in terms of information theory. On the basis of this framework, I compare pupillary data from past studies to simple information-theoretic simulations of task designs and show good correspondance with data across studies. The present framework has the potential to unify the large set of results reported on pupillary dilation to cognition and to provide a theory to guide future research.

Highlights

  • Subject Category: Neuroscience and cognition Subject Areas: neuroscience, computational biology, cognition Keywords: cognitive neuroscience, pupillometry, information theory, computational neuroscience, psychopysiology, arousal

  • In accordance with the information model, Reinhard et al showed that pupillary response depended only on the probability of occurrence of the features of the GO/NOGO stimuli that were informative about the task

  • Larger pupil dilation is associated with larger distractor interference [58], and increased processing of subliminal cues [59], in agreement with the view that pupil response scales with the quantity of visual information being processed

Read more

Summary

Cognitive pupillary response

Besides the well-known response of pupillary muscles to light, which narrows the range of light intensity reaching the retina and optimizing its information capacity [1], pupil size varies as a function of a wealth of cognitive phenomena, including mental effort [2,3,4,5], surprise [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15], emotion [16], decision processes [17,18,19,20], decision biases [19,21,22], value beliefs [23,24,25], volatility (unexpected uncertainty; [10,26,27,28]), exploitation/exploration trade-off [29,30], attention [31,32,33,34,35,36], uncertainty [12,19,21,23,25,37,38], confidence [39], response to reward [40], learning rate [10,41,42,43], neural gain [10,36,44,45], or urgency [46]. I will review a large breadth of findings from the literature and will reinterpret them under the light of that framework

Surprise and self-information
Information about task variables
Decision making
Mental effort
Relation to alternative theories
Limitations
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call