Abstract

Human rights has been a vital tool in the global movement to reduce maternal mortality and to expose the disrespect and abuse that women experience during childbirth in facilities around the world. Yet to truly transform the relationship between women and providers, human rights-based approaches (HRBAs) will need to go beyond articulation, dissemination and even legal enforcement of formal norms of respectful maternity care. HRBAs must also develop a deeper, more nuanced understanding of how power operates in health systems under particular social, cultural and political conditions, if they are to effectively challenge settled patterns of behaviour and health systems structures that marginalise and abuse. In this paper, we report results from a mixed methods study in two hospitals in the Tanga region of Tanzania, comparing the prevalence of disrespect and abuse during childbirth as measured through observation by trained nurses stationed in maternity wards to prevalence as measured by the self-report upon discharge of the same women who had been observed. The huge disparity between these two measures (baseline: 69.83% observation vs. 9.91% self-report; endline: 32.91% observation vs. 7.59% self-report) suggests that disrespect and abuse is both internalised and normalised by users and providers alike. Building on qualitative research conducted in the study sites, we explore the mechanisms by which hidden and invisible power enforces internalisation and normalisation, and describe the implications for the development of HRBAs in maternal health.

Highlights

  • We compare two methods for measuring disrespect and abuse (D&A) and highlight the huge difference between the prevalence of D&A as measured by women’s self-report versus by third-party observation. We explore how this difference illuminates the ways that power works in the childbirth encounter and its implications for developing a human rights-based approach (HRBA) to maternal health

  • In a study of 469 births in two hospitals in the Tanga region of Tanzania, we found that the prevalence of D&A as measured through third-party observation was dramatically higher than the prevalence of D&A measured through parturient women’s self-report

  • We propose that the disparate prevalence measurements should be seen less as a contest between two ways of quantifying a single objective phenomenon and more as a red flag alerting us to a deeper, more challenging dynamic to be uncovered, analysed and addressed in efforts to build a HRBA to maternal health.[21]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Human rights has been a vital tool in repositioning maternal mortality and morbidity in the public imagination and on the public health agenda. Labelled as disrespect and abuse (D&A), mistreatment, or obstetric violence, the issue has recently emerged at the top of the global quality of care agenda and the broader reproductive justice movement as well. Some have initiated formal litigation in national court systems to demand redress in particular cases.[3]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call