Abstract

This prospective study aimed at determine whether eye irrigation removes ocular foreign bodies (FBs) and whether ocular pain predicts FBs. Emergency department patients complaining of ocular FBs were enrolled. In the irrigation group (n = 52), pain was evaluated with a visual analog scale before and after irrigation, and the presence of FBs was determined under a slit-lamp. In the nonirrigation group (n = 27), the evaluations were performed upon arrival. The corneal FB retention rate was found significantly lower in the irrigation (13/52, 25%) than in the nonirrigation groups (13/27, 48%; P = 0.04). After irrigation, those without FBs had more patients experiencing pain reduction (67%) compared to those with retained FBs (46%; P = 0.14) and had a greater magnitude of change in pain score (mean ± SD, − 2.6 ± 2.7 vs. − 0.7 ± 1.4; P = 0.02). An improvement in ocular pain score ≥ 5 points after irrigation predicted the absence of FBs with a negative predictive value of 100%. Eye irrigation significantly lowered corneal FB retention; if ocular pain decreased considerably, the probability of retained FBs was low, making irrigation-associated pain score reduction a feasible diagnostic method to exclude FB retention without needing specialized ophthalmic examinations.

Highlights

  • This prospective study aimed at determine whether eye irrigation removes ocular foreign bodies (FBs) and whether ocular pain predicts FBs

  • After two patients with an intraocular FB discovered during ophthalmologist examination were excluded, 79 patients were analyzed

  • The ocular pain scores on arrival to the emergency department (ED) were similar in the nonirrigation (4.0 ± 2.8) and irrigation (4.4 ± 2.9) groups (P = 0.50)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This prospective study aimed at determine whether eye irrigation removes ocular foreign bodies (FBs) and whether ocular pain predicts FBs. Among patients visiting EDs with ophthalmic primary complaints, corneal abrasions and foreign bodies (FBs) on the ocular surface are among the leading diagnoses, and these two diagnoses respectively represent approximately 13–14% and 8–15% of the ­complaints[4,5]. These patients probably visited the ED because of persistent ocular FB sensation and concerns that a FB remained inside the eye. During the ophthalmologic consultations that follow, many patients report that their ocular pain greatly diminished after irrigation, and among such patients, retained FBs are uncommon

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call