Abstract

BackgroundCompetition is considered to rely on the value attributed to resources by animals, but the influence of extrinsic stressors on this value remains unexplored. Although natural or anthropogenic environmental stress often drives decreased competition, assumptions that this relies on resource devaluation are without formal evidence. According to theory, physiological or perceptual effects may influence contest behaviour directly, but motivational changes due to resource value are expected to manifest as behavioural adjustments only in interaction with attainment costs and resource benefits. Thus, we hypothesise that stressor-induced resource devaluations will impose greater effects when attainment costs are high, but not when resource benefits are higher. Noise may elicit such effects because it impacts the acoustic environment and imposes physiological and behavioural costs to animals. Therefore, we manipulated the acoustic environment using playbacks of artificial noise to test our hypotheses in the territorial male Siamese fighting fish, Betta splendens.ResultsCompared to a no-playback control, noise reduced defense motivation only when territory owners faced comparatively bigger opponents that impose greater injury costs, but not when territories also contained bubble nests that offer reproductive benefits. In turn, nest-size decreases were noted only after contests under noise treatment, but temporal nest-size changes relied on cross-contest variation in noise and comparative opponent size. Thus, the combined effects of noise are conditional on added attainment costs and offset by exceeding resource benefits.ConclusionOur findings provide support for the hypothesised modulation of resource value under extrinsic stress and suggest implications for competition under increasing anthropogenic activity.

Highlights

  • Competition is considered to rely on the value attributed to resources by animals, but the influence of extrinsic stressors on this value remains unexplored

  • Fish fighting over territory with a nest exhibited overall shorter startle durations, and greater aggressive motivation, independently of acoustic conditions, but those fighting over territory without a nest exhibited longer startle durations under noise than the control

  • Changes in the acoustic environment with the addition of artificial noise negatively influenced the motivation of B. splendens males to defend and subsequently use territory

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Competition is considered to rely on the value attributed to resources by animals, but the influence of extrinsic stressors on this value remains unexplored. We hypothesise that stressor-induced resource devaluations will impose greater effects when attainment costs are high, but not when resource benefits are higher Noise may elicit such effects because it impacts the acoustic environment and imposes physiological and behavioural costs to animals. Contest theory predicts that resource competition, a key driver of natural and sexual selection, is influenced by resource value, with contestants expected to modulate their behaviour according to the perceived or attributed value [1]. This value is typically described in terms of quality, comprising a set of intrinsic factors adding costs or benefits to resources [2,3,4]. The way that this might be further impacted by extrinsic factors has been largely neglected, with only few recent examples (e.g. water-flow and oxygen-concentration effects on sea anemone territorial contests [11, 12])

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call