Extreme Medialized Repair for Challenging Large and Massive Rotator Cuff Tears Reveals Healing and Significant Functional Improvement

Abstract

This study evaluated range of motion, muscle strength, clinical outcomes, and radiographic results of the extreme medialized procedure on rotator cuff tears that were initially irreparable. From arthroscopic rotator cuff repair cases performed at our institution (June 2017 and August 2020), we retrospectively reviewed cases in which the rotator cuff was (1) unable to be withdrawn to the greater tuberosity, (2) repaired using the extreme medialized procedure, and (3) followed up for a minimum of 2 years. Patients with a history of previous surgery were excluded. Preoperative and postoperative scores were used for clinical evaluation. Imaging evaluation used 2-year postoperative magnetic resonance (MR) images. Sixty-four patients met the criteria; mean age 68.2 ± 7.9 (range 51-82) years; mean follow-up period 26 ± 2 (24-37) months. Tear size: 45 ± 7.1 (30-70) mm in medial to lateral diameters, 40 ± 9.3 (30-60) mm in anteroposterior diameter; suture anchor number: 5.5 ± 1.2 (4-8). The visual analog scale score (50.7 to 11.8), the University of California, Los Angeles, score (12 to 31), constant score (45 to 31), and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (53 to 31) at the final follow-up improved compared with preoperative values (all P<.0001). Preoperative and postoperative changes in range of motion also showed improvement in anterior elevation (107° to 151°, P < .0001), abduction (100° to 154°, P < .0001), external rotation (41° to 47°, P= .0238), and internal rotation (L1 to Th10, P < .0001). Muscle strength was also improved in abduction (from 1.9 kg to 5.0 kg, P < .0001) and external rotation (from 3.5 kg to 7.7 kg, P < .0001). MR imaging evaluation revealed 2 cases (3.1%) of retears that fell into type 4 Sugaya classification. Extremely medialized repair of large and massive tears not able to be repairedusing conventional techniques led to improved clinical outcomes compared to preoperative conditions. Level IV, therapeutic case series.