Abstract

Abstract. Climate extremes can affect the functioning of terrestrial ecosystems, for instance via a reduction of the photosynthetic capacity or alterations of respiratory processes. Yet the dominant regional and seasonal effects of hydrometeorological extremes are still not well documented and in the focus of this paper. Specifically, we quantify and characterize the role of large spatiotemporal extreme events in gross primary production (GPP) as triggers of continental anomalies. We also investigate seasonal dynamics of extreme impacts on continental GPP anomalies. We find that the 50 largest positive extremes (i.e., statistically unusual increases in carbon uptake rates) and negative extremes (i.e., statistically unusual decreases in carbon uptake rates) on each continent can explain most of the continental variation in GPP, which is in line with previous results obtained at the global scale. We show that negative extremes are larger than positive ones and demonstrate that this asymmetry is particularly strong in South America and Europe. Our analysis indicates that the overall impacts and the spatial extents of GPP extremes are power-law distributed with exponents that vary little across continents. Moreover, we show that on all continents and for all data sets the spatial extents play a more important role for the overall impact of GPP extremes compared to the durations or maximal GPP. An analysis of possible causes across continents indicates that most negative extremes in GPP can be attributed clearly to water scarcity, whereas extreme temperatures play a secondary role. However, for Europe, South America and Oceania we also identify fire as an important driver. Our findings are consistent with remote sensing products. An independent validation against a literature survey on specific extreme events supports our results to a large extent.

Highlights

  • The terrestrial carbon cycle is tightly linked to the global climate system

  • Earlier attempts to describe disturbance events in form of power laws were restricted to their spatial extent (Fisher et al, 2008; Gloor et al, 2009; Kellner and Asner, 2009; Asner et al, 2013)

  • It has recently been shown that the overall impacts of negative extreme events in fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (fAPAR) (Reichstein et al, 2013; Zscheischler et al, 2013) and gross primary production (GPP) (Zscheischler et al, 2014) can be well approximated by power laws at the global scale

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The terrestrial carbon cycle is tightly linked to the global climate system. Favorable conditions for vegetation in the future are expected to increase terrestrial carbon uptake, while extreme climatic conditions might drastically decrease this uptake (Reichstein et al, 2013). The impacts of climate extremes on ecosystems and the carbon cycle are diverse. Storms transform carbon stocks from living biomass to dead wood and increase the risk of fire and pathogen outbreaks (Negrón-Juárez and Chambers, 2010). Droughts and heat waves have an impact on plant physiology, phenology and carbon allocation (Ciais et al, 2005; Reichstein et al, 2007; Phillips et al, 2009).

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call