Extra-short humeral heads reduce glenohumeral joint overstuffing compared with short heads in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.

Abstract

BackgroundRotator cuff tears and glenoid loosening remain the two most common causes for revision after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. Oversizing of the humeral head leads to increased contact force across the glenohumeral joint and is hypothesized to contribute to clinical and radiographic failure. The purpose of this study is to compare the rate of radiographic overstuffing between standard short humeral heads and newer extra-short heads with decreased lateral offset.MethodsFifty-five consecutive anatomic total shoulder arthroplasties performed using extra-short humeral heads were retrospectively reviewed and compared with age- and sex-matched controls receiving standard short heads. A total of 110 postoperative radiographs were analyzed using the Iannotti's perfect circle method to compare the prosthesis' center of rotation (COR) with the native humeral head COR. A difference in the COR of >3.0 mm was considered malpositioned. Malpositioning medially was considered overstuffed, and malpositioning laterally was considered understuffed. The direction of displacement of malpositioned prostheses was categorized using a quadrant system. Furthermore, we used a novel method to evaluate medial and superior overstuffing by measuring the displacement between the anatomic and prosthetic head positions along perpendicular axes.ResultsUsing the Iannotti's perfect circle method, 56% of heads were malpositioned. Overstuffing occurred more frequently with short heads compared with extra-short heads (47% vs. 4%, P < .001). Conversely, understuffing occurred more frequently with extra-short heads (47% vs. 15%, P = .001). Malpositioned extra-short heads were most frequently placed in the inferomedial quadrant (93% vs. 24%, P < .001), whereas malpositioned short heads were most commonly placed in the superomedial quadrant (56% vs. 7%, P < .001). Our novel measurement method demonstrated that extra-short heads reduced medial overstuffing (2.8 ± 2.8 mm vs. 0.3 ± 2.0 mm, P < .001). Both extra-short and short heads had similar rates of superior malpositioning (1.6 ± 2.2 mm vs. 1.4 ± 1.5 mm, P = .683).ConclusionRoutine use of extra-short humeral head sizes reduces the rate of medial glenohumeral joint overstuffing but not superior malpositioning. This is hypothesized to improve clinical outcomes, but future studies are needed to assess the relationship between improved humeral head fit and clinical outcomes.