Abstract
The term "extrapyramidal system/symptoms/signs" and the acronym "EPS" have been abundantly used in neurology and psychiatry literature for more than a century. However, EPS has been increasingly criticized, especially by movement disorder neurologists, for its lack of clinical, anatomical, and physiologic definition. Contrary to traditional assumptions, pyramidal and extrapyramidal systems are not mutually exclusive. The acronym EPS, commonly used to denote drug-induced movement disorders, lacks specificity in conveying the nature and severity of these and other movement disorders. Consequently, we propose that the term is retired from scientific literature and that clinicians use specific phenomenologic descriptors for the various hypokinetc and hyperkinetic movement disorders.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
