Abstract

A case is presented of a boy who had a relentlessly progressive brain tumor involving the upper cervical cord. The only way to maintain nutritional support was intravenous hyperalimentation (IVH) at home, which seemed contraindicated because the boy's prognosis was considered hopeless, the family lived in an area remote from medical support, the parents had minimal or no education, and the family was in dire economic circumstances. Nevertheless, home IVH was initiated. The boy had 18 months of totally uneventful IVH, with good weight gain and a quality of life that was fully acceptable to him and his family. This case is discussed in the light of two differing perceptions of IVH: (1) as a medical intervention that can be discontinued (the currently dominant view) and (2) as a basic nutritional support. The ethnic and economic background of the patient whose case is reviewed expands the discussion to include the psychosocial

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.