Extraluminal tissue pressure: what does it mean?

Abstract

INVITED EDITORIALExtraluminal tissue pressure: what does it mean?Alan R. Schwartz, Jason Kirkness, and Philip SmithAlan R. Schwartz, Jason Kirkness, and Philip SmithPublished Online:01 Jan 2006https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01239.2005MoreSectionsPDF (53 KB)Download PDF ToolsExport citationAdd to favoritesGet permissionsTrack citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInWeChat In this issue of the Journal of Applied Physiology, Kairaitis et al. (9) examine the control of pharyngeal extraluminal tissue pressure by mandibular advancement and jaw position. Utilizing a novel approach for measuring peripharyngeal tissue pressures, they demonstrated that mandibular advancement decreased tissue pressures anterior and lateral to the airway lumen. Decreases in the lateral peripharyngeal tissue pressure led to the greatest improvement in airway patency when the mouth was closed. These investigators concluded that regional tissue pressures were differentially regulated based on the direction of mandibular advancement. Observed differences in force transmission to the lateral and anterior peripharyngeal space have both mechanistic and clinical implications.Extraluminal tissue pressure has long been considered an important determinant of upper airway patency (4, 5, 16-18, 24). It influences the degree of airway collapse by changing the transmural pressure, which is defined as the difference between the intraluminal and extraluminal pressures. Initial efforts to model the upper airway as a simple collapsible conduit highlighted the impact of transmural pressure changes on airway patency (5, 16–18). The upper airway remained patent when the transmural pressure was positive, and it was occluded when the transmural pressure became negative. In early studies, the extraluminal tissue pressure was inferred by determining the nasal pressure required to occlude the upper airway. In sleep apnea patients, the airway occluded at positive nasal pressures, implying a positive extraluminal tissue pressure during sleep (18). In contrast, normal individuals required a subatmospheric nasal pressure to occlude the upper airway, implying that the extraluminal tissue pressure was negative (17). In fact, as subatmospheric pressure was applied and the transmural pressure became negative, the upper airway occluded (17), and recurrent obstructive apneas, oxyhemoglobin desaturations, and arousals from sleep ensued (10). Thus the transmural pressure was considered the essential physiological determinant of upper airway patency, with decreases in transmural pressure (below atmosphere) causing obstructive sleep apnea.In addition to alterations in transmural pressure, investigators subsequently found that mucosal tension within the airway wall can also influence upper airway patency (13). When caudal traction was applied to the trachea, an increase in tension within the pharyngeal mucosa substantially decreased upper airway collapsibility (13, 20–22). Decreased collapsibility was attributed to stiffening of the pharyngeal wall rather than reductions in extraluminal tissue pressures, as previously described (5). Moreover, caudal traction amplified the decrease in upper airway collapsibility when pharyngeal structures were dilated simultaneously (14). Thus forces acting simultaneously in longitudinal and radial directions interacted to stabilize pharyngeal patency. The conceptual basis for this interaction is depicted in Fig. 1, which illustrates how stiffening the airway mucosa can enhance the effect of dilating forces on extraluminal pressure. As shown, forces acting in parallel or perpendicular to the airway lumen can reduce collapsibility through distinct effects on airway wall tension and extraluminal tissue pressure.In the present issue, Kairaitis et al. (9) provide direct evidence in rabbits that mandibular advancement, which dilates the pharyngeal lumen, decreases upper airway collapsibility by lowering extraluminal tissue pressures. In addition, they further established a directional component in the regulation of extraluminal tissue pressures by mandibular advancement. Their findings support the concept that greater decreases in surrounding tissue pressures occur when forces are applied in both the longitudinal (axial) and radial directions (Fig. 1). Thus mandibular advancement may be most effective in restoring pharyngeal patency when it exerts directional forces that both decompress surrounding tissues and stiffen the pharyngeal wall.Kairaitis et al. (9) provide additional insight into underlying mechanisms of upper airway obstruction in humans during anesthesia and sleep. Isono and coworkers (8, 23) have suggested that the mandible forms a boney enclosure around the pharynx. They have shown that upper airway collapsibility, as reflected by measurements of critical closing pressures, varies inversely with mandibular size and position, and they have suggested that compression of extraluminal tissues by the mandible can account for elevations in collapsibility. Mouth opening, which reduces the size of the bony enclosure, has been associated with substantial increases in upper airway collapsibility (critical closing pressures) (1, 7, 19). Kairaitis et al. (9) have extended this model, and they provide direct evidence for reductions in extraluminal tissues with mandibular advancement. Decreases in the lateral peripharyngeal tissue pressure led to the greatest improvement in airway patency (resistance) when the mouth was closed, consistent with the notion that collapse of the lateral pharyngeal walls plays a major role in the pathogenesis of upper airway obstruction during sleep (11, 15). These findings also suggest that the susceptibility to airway obstruction may be primarily related to a loss of mucosal tension and that therapeutic responses to mandibular advancement (12) may be enhanced by minimizing mouth opening and increasing longitudinal wall tension simultaneously. Indeed, airway narrowing in the lateral dimension may be viewed as a sensitive marker for underlying defects in longitudinal tension that predispose to obstructive sleep apnea (15).The work by Kairaitis et al. (9) still leaves several questions unanswered. First, although the present methods can be used to approximate the relative changes in extraluminal tissue pressures with mandibular manipulation, they may well underestimate the impact of tissue pressure on critical transmural pressures associated with airway collapse (2, 3). Second, the investigators report the effect of mandibular advancement on upper airway resistance rather than collapsibility (critical closing pressure). Critical closing pressure measurements could be used to partition effects of mandibular advancement between the extraluminal tissues and airway wall. Third, the effects of upper airway neuromuscular activity on extraluminal tissue pressure remain to be elucidated. Nevertheless, Kairaitis et al. have advanced our understanding of extraluminal tissue pressure and its potential contribution to the pathogenesis of obstructive sleep apnea. Fig. 1.Effects of caudal and radial traction on mucosal tension and extraluminal tissue pressure. Caudal traction leads to an increase in mucosal tension (see C and D), whereas radial traction decompresses the surrounding tissues (see A and B). The effect of radial traction on surrounding tissue pressure is enhanced when the mucosa is taut (compare C and D vs. A and B). [Modified from Rowley JA et al. (13).]Download figureDownload PowerPointREFERENCES1 Ayuse T, Inazawa T, Kurata S, Okayasu I, Sakamoto E, Oi K, Schneider H, and Schwartz AR. Mouth-opening increases upper-airway collapsibility without changing resistance during midazolam sedation. J Dent Res 83: 718–722, 2004.Crossref | ISI | Google Scholar2 Brouillette RT and Thach BT. A neuromuscular mechanism maintaining extrathoracic airway patency. J Appl Physiol 46: 772–779, 1979.Link | ISI | Google Scholar3 Brouillette RT and Thach BT. Control of genioglossus muscle inspiratory activity. J Appl Physiol 49: 801–808, 1980.Link | ISI | Google Scholar4 Gleadhill IC, Schwartz AR, Schubert N, Wise RA, Permutt S, and Smith PL. Upper airway collapsibility in snorers and in patients with obstructive hypopnea and apnea. Am Rev Respir Dis 143: 1300–1303, 1991.Crossref | ISI | Google Scholar5 Gold AR and Schwartz AR. The pharyngeal critical pressure. The whys and hows of using nasal continuous positive airway pressure diagnostically. Chest 110: 1077–1088, 1996.Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar6 Heinzer RC, Stanchina ML, Malhotra A, Fogel RB, Patel SR, Jordan AS, Schory K, and White DP. Lung volume and continuous positive airway pressure requirements in obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 172: 114–117, 2005.Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar7 Inazawa T, Ayuse T, Kurata S, Okayasu I, Sakamoto E, Oi K, Schneider H, and Schwartz AR. Effect of mandibular position on upper airway collapsibility and resistance. J Dent Res 84: 554–558, 2005.Crossref | ISI | Google Scholar8 Isono S, Tanaka A, Tagaito Y, Ishikawa T, and Nishino T. Influences of head positions and bite opening on collapsibility of the passive pharynx. J Appl Physiol 97: 339–346, 2004.Link | ISI | Google Scholar9 Kairatis K, Stavrinou R, Parikh R, Wheatley JR, and Amis TC. Mandibular advancement decreases pressures in the tissues surrounding the upper airway in rabbits. J Appl Physiol 100: 349–356, 2006.Link | ISI | Google Scholar10 King ED, O'Donnell CP, Smith PL, and Schwartz AR. A model of obstructive sleep apnea in normal humans. Role of the upper airway. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 161: 1979–1984, 2000.Crossref | ISI | Google Scholar11 Leiter JC. Upper airway shape: is it important in the pathogenesis of obstructive sleep apnea? Am J Respir Crit Care Med 153: 894–898, 1996.Crossref | ISI | Google Scholar12 Ng AT, Gotsopoulos H, Qian J, and Cistulli PA. Effect of oral appliance therapy on upper airway collapsibility in obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 168: 238–241, 2003.Crossref | ISI | Google Scholar13 Rowley JA, Permutt S, Willey S, Smith PL, and Schwartz AR. Effect of tracheal and tongue displacement on upper airway airflow dynamics. J Appl Physiol 80: 2171–2178, 1996.Link | ISI | Google Scholar14 Rowley JA, Williams BC, Smith PL, and Schwartz AR. Neuromuscular activity and upper airway collapsibility: mechanism of action in the decerebrate cat. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 156: 515–21, 1997.Crossref | ISI | Google Scholar15 Schwab RJ, Gupta KB, Gefter WB, Metzger LJ, Hoffman EA, and Pack AI. Upper airway and soft tissue anatomy in normal subjects and patients with sleep-disordered breathing. Significance of the lateral pharyngeal walls. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 152: 1673–1689, 1995.Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar16 Schwartz AR, Smith PL, Wise RA, Bankman I, and Permutt S. Effect of positive nasal pressure on upper airway pressure-flow relationships. J Appl Physiol 66: 1626–1634, 1989.Link | ISI | Google Scholar17 Schwartz AR, Smith PL, Wise RA, Gold AR, and Permutt S. Induction of upper airway occlusion in sleeping individuals with subatmospheric nasal pressure. J Appl Physiol 64: 535–542, 1988.Link | ISI | Google Scholar18 Smith PL, Wise RA, Gold AR, Schwartz AR, and Permutt S. Upper airway pressure-flow relationships in obstructive sleep apnea. J Appl Physiol 64: 789–795, 1988.Link | ISI | Google Scholar19 Tanaka A, Isono S, and Nishino T. Modulation of reopening of the passive pharynx in humans: a role of surface adhesive forces (Abstract). Am J Respir Crit Care Med 155: A412, 1997.Google Scholar20 Thut DC, Schwartz AR, Roach D, Wise RA, Permutt S, and Smith PL. Tracheal and neck position influence upper airway airflow dynamics by altering airway length. J Appl Physiol 75: 2084–2090, 1993.Link | ISI | Google Scholar21 Van de Graaff WB. Thoracic influence on upper airway patency. J Appl Physiol 65: 2124–2131, 1988.Link | ISI | Google Scholar22 Van de Graaff WB. Thoracic traction on the trachea: mechanisms and magnitude. J Appl Physiol 70: 1328–1336, 1991.Link | ISI | Google Scholar23 Watanabe T, Isono S, Tanaka A, Tanzawa H, and Nishino T. Contribution of body habitus and craniofacial characteristics to segmental closing pressures of the passive pharynx in patients with sleep-disordered breathing. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 165: 260–265, 2002.Crossref | PubMed | ISI | Google Scholar24 Winakur SJ, Smith PL, and Schwartz AR. Pathophysiology and risk factors for obstructive sleep apnea. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 19: 99–112, 1998.ISI | Google Scholar Download PDF Previous Back to Top Next FiguresReferencesRelatedInformationCited ByFinite element simulations of surface effect on Rayleigh wavesAIP Advances, Vol. 8, No. 3Was tun bei Schlafapnoe und COPD?13 December 2017 | CME, Vol. 14, No. 12Origin of the nitrogen over- and understoichiometry in Ti 0.5 Al 0.5 N thin films22 March 2012 | Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, Vol. 24, No. 15Mechanical parameters determining pharyngeal collapsibility in patients with sleep apneaArie Oliven, Eran Kaufman, Rotem Kaynan, Ron Oliven, Uri Steinfeld, Nave Tov, Majed Odeh, Luis Gaitini, Alan R. Schwartz, and Eitan Kimmel1 October 2010 | Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol. 109, No. 4General Interface Conditions in Surface Elasticity of Nanoscaled Solids in General Curvilinear Coordinates5 May 2011 | Journal of Mechanics, Vol. 26, No. 01Modeling of metal-ferroelectric-insulator-semiconductor structures based on Langmuir–Blodgett copolymer filmsJournal of Applied Physics, Vol. 106, No. 12Pharyngeal airway volume and shape from cone-beam computed tomography: Relationship to facial morphologyAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Vol. 136, No. 6Interacting effects of genioglossus stimulation and mandibular advancement in sleep apneaRon Oliven, Naveh Tov, Majed Odeh, Luis Gaitini, Uri Steinfeld, Alan R. Schwartz, and Arie Oliven1 May 2009 | Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol. 106, No. 5MBE-grown NiyMg1-yO and ZnxMg1-xO Thin Films for Deep Ultraviolet Optoelectronic Applications1 February 2011 | MRS Proceedings, Vol. 1201MBE-grown NiyMg1-yO and ZnxMg1-xO Thin Films for Deep Ultraviolet Optoelectronic Applications31 January 2011 | MRS Proceedings, Vol. 1201Quality and Growth Rate of Hot-wire Chemical Vapor Deposition Epitaxial Si Layers1 February 2011 | MRS Proceedings, Vol. 1066 More from this issue > Volume 100Issue 1January 2006Pages 5-6 Copyright & PermissionsCopyright © 2006 the American Physiological Societyhttps://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01239.2005PubMed16357077History Published online 1 January 2006 Published in print 1 January 2006 Metrics