Abstract
Author discusses extrajudicial eviction in legal theory and practice. It is debatable whether the acquirer must initiate the “provocative litigation” against a third party who claims that a certain right belongs to him in order to exercise the rights regarding eviction in the case of extrajudicial harassment. The positive answer would deny the existence of extrajudicial eviction. After analysing the historical evolution of the institute, different views of legal authors, the legislative attitude in domestic and comparative law, author concludes that there are situations in which the acquirer will enjoy the right to protection regardless of if the right of the third party was established by the court. Protection shall be granted if the right of the third party is established on a firm basis and if the acquirer has acquired the right on the different basis to the extent that he should have acquired by a contract.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
