Abstract
Two extraction methods were successfully applied to study the extraction of imidacloprid from soil. The first method, using a mix of acetone and hexane, was based on Soxhlet extraction, and the second method, using acetonitrile, methanol, and water, was a modified version of a liquid extraction method. Quantification was performed by reversed-phase High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) with Diode Array Detection (DAD) at 270 nm using 40:60 (v/v) acetonitrile/water as a mobile phase. The mean recoveries for imidacloprid from soil ranged from 82.6 to 109%, with a relative standard deviation between 1.9 and 5.6% for both extraction methods. The detector linearity and the reproducibility of the method proved to be very precise. The limits of detection were 0.08 and 0.06 mg kg−1 for liquid extraction and Soxhlet extraction, respectively. Overall, the efficiency of the Soxhlet extraction at lower concentrations was better than at higher concentrations, while liquid extraction proved efficient for all spiked levels. Liquid extraction performed better at higher concentrations compared to Soxhlet extraction. Taken together, our study suggests that the analysis of imidacloprid in soil can be performed with the modified liquid extraction method with a higher recovery and a lower RSD than Soxhlet extraction.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Soil and Sediment Contamination: An International Journal
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
