Abstract

Ca2+ imaging is a widely used microscopy technique to simultaneously study cellular activity in multiple cells. The desired information consists of cell-specific time series of pixel intensity values, in which the fluorescence intensity represents cellular activity. For static scenes, cellular signal extraction is straightforward, however multiple analysis challenges are present in recordings of contractile tissues, like those of the enteric nervous system (ENS). This layer of critical neurons, embedded within the muscle layers of the gut wall, shows optical overlap between neighboring neurons, intensity changes due to cell activity, and constant movement. These challenges reduce the applicability of classical segmentation techniques and traditional stack alignment and regions-of-interest (ROIs) selection workflows. Therefore, a signal extraction method capable of dealing with moving cells and is insensitive to large intensity changes in consecutive frames is needed. Here we propose a b-spline active contour method to delineate and track neuronal cell bodies based on local and global energy terms. We develop both a single as well as a double-contour approach. The latter takes advantage of the appearance of GCaMP expressing cells, and tracks the nucleus’ boundaries together with the cytoplasmic contour, providing a stable delineation of neighboring, overlapping cells despite movement and intensity changes. The tracked contours can also serve as landmarks to relocate additional and manually-selected ROIs. This improves the total yield of efficacious cell tracking and allows signal extraction from other cell compartments like neuronal processes. Compared to manual delineation and other segmentation methods, the proposed method can track cells during large tissue deformations and high-intensity changes such as during neuronal firing events, while preserving the shape of the extracted Ca2+ signal. The analysis package represents a significant improvement to available Ca2+ imaging analysis workflows for ENS recordings and other systems where movement challenges traditional Ca2+ signal extraction workflows.

Highlights

  • In order to understand how complex cellular systems operate and interact with each other, it is essential to be able to record activity from many individual cells simultaneously

  • We found that ­Ca2+ profiles are very comparable in shape between extraction from tracked cells versus manually drawn ROIs, with a normalized root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 0.093 and 0.114 for onelayer or double contours respectively (Fig. 7B)

  • We found that the ­Ca2+ peak shape was preserved in most cells (Fig. 7C), and the median Root Mean-Square Error (RMSE) in the one-layer and double contour approach to be 0.1216 and 0.1738 to be comparable to that of the manually selected ROIs with an RMSE of 0.1212 (Fig. 7D)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In order to understand how complex cellular systems operate and interact with each other, it is essential to be able to record activity from many individual cells simultaneously. The power of the method is in the fact that the focus of analysis can be at the individual cell level as well as on the network of interacting cells As such it allows studying and understanding communication between cooperating functional groups of neurons (or other cells) at a high spatiotemporal ­resolution[6,7,8]. A traditional analysis workflow in C­ a2+ imaging starts with image registration of the recorded frames to correct for motion artifacts and slight underlying movements aiming to attain a completely static scene where each pixel represents the same physical location throughout all ­frames[11] This step, if successful, is followed by signal extraction, where the different cells of interest are delineated and their pixel intensity profiles are extracted. For the large majority of ­Ca2+ imaging experiments, this workflow is sufficient to efficiently analyze cellular activity profiles and has been used extensively in ENS C­ a2+ imaging provided that contractions are restrained either pharmacologically, physically, or in c­ ombination[12,13]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call