Abstract

Extracting horizon surfaces from key reflections in a seismic image is an important step of the interpretation process. Interpreting a reflection surface in a geologically complex area is a difficult and time-consuming task, and it requires an understanding of the 3D subsurface geometry. Common methods to help automate the process are based on tracking waveforms in a local window around manual picks. Those approaches often fail when the wavelet character lacks lateral continuity or when reflections are truncated by faults. We have formulated horizon picking as a multiclass segmentation problem and solved it by supervised training of a 3D convolutional neural network. We design an efficient architecture to analyze the data over multiple scales while keeping memory and computational needs to a practical level. To allow for uncertainties in the exact location of the reflections, we use a probabilistic formulation to express the horizons position. By using a masked loss function, we give interpreters flexibility when picking the training data. Our method allows experts to interactively improve the results of the picking by fine training the network in the more complex areas. We also determine how our algorithm can be used to extend horizons to the prestack domain by following reflections across offsets planes, even in the presence of residual moveout. We validate our approach on two field data sets and show that it yields accurate results on nontrivial reflectivity while being trained from a workable amount of manually picked data. Initial training of the network takes approximately 1 h, and the fine training and prediction on a large seismic volume take a minute at most.

Highlights

  • A key step in seismic interpretation is the mapping of the main horizons in the amplitude volume

  • We work with a 3D convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and propose two detailed and challenging case studies, in which we identify the strengths and limitations associated with the use of neural networks to pick horizons

  • By keeping the total number of free parameters of the CNN small and by using regularization and data augmentation, we show that our method requires only reasonable manual work to prepare the training data

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A key step in seismic interpretation is the mapping of the main horizons in the amplitude volume. Typical surveys contain hundreds of inlines and crosslines, which makes the manual interpretation of these surfaces a time-consuming task. Working with an autopicker is usually an iterative process in which the interpreter starts by dropping seed points on the desired reflection and gives some key information such as the waveform phase or the expected maximal vertical deviation between two adjacent traces. The tracker uses those hints to extract a 2D surface from the 3D data by finding related waveforms between traces using similarity measures. More seeds are progressively added, and the Manuscript received by the Editor 23 August 2019; revised manuscript received 8 February 2020; published ahead of production 13 March 2020; published online 08 April 2020

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call