Abstract
Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is characterized by failure of diaphragmatic development with lung hypoplasia and persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN). If conventional treatment with gentle ventilation and optimized vasoactive medication fails, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) may be considered. The benefits of ECMO in CDH are still controversial, since there are only few randomized trials demonstrating the advantages of this therapeutic option. At present, there is no precise prenatal and/or early postnatal prognostication parameter to predict reversibility of PPHN in CDH patients. Indications for initiating ECMO include either respiratory or circulatory parameters, which are also undergoing continuous refinement. Centers with higher case numbers and the availability of ECMO published promising survival rates, but data on long-term results, including morbidity and quality of life, are rare. Survival might be influenced by the timing of ECMO initiation and the timing of surgical repair. In this regard a trend toward early initiation of ECMO and early surgery on ECMO exists. The results concerning the cannulation modes are similar and a consensus on time limit for ECMO runs does not exist. The use of ECMO in CDH will continue to be evaluated, and prospective randomized trials and registry network are necessary to help answering the addressed questions of patient selection and management.
Highlights
Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is currently the most common indication for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in neonates [1]
Survival rates reported by the extracorporeal life support organization (ELSO) have continued to drop in the modern era [2] and systematic reviews concerning a benefit of ECMO in CDH did not find an advantage for ECMO [3,4,5]
We present a review of literature in this complex patient group and try to answer some questions about optimal time to start ECMO, recommended entry criteria, mode of ECMO, and timing of operation
Summary
Edited by: Giacomo Cavallaro, IRCCS Ca’ Granda Foundation Maggiore Policlinico Hospital, Italy. Reviewed by: Tim Jancelewicz, University of Tennessee Health Science Center (UTHSC), United States Bernhard Resch, Medical University of Graz, Austria. Specialty section: This article was submitted to Pediatric Critical Care, a section of the journal Frontiers in Pediatrics
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.