Abstract

Humans, like all organisms, are subject to fundamental biophysical laws. Van Valen predicted that, because of zero-sum dynamics, all populations of all species in a given environment flux the same amount of energy on average. Damuth’s ’energetic equivalence rule’ supported Van Valen´s conjecture by showing a tradeoff between few big animals per area with high individual metabolic rates compared to abundant small species with low energy requirements. We use metabolic scaling theory to compare variation in densities and individual energy use in human societies to other land mammals. We show that hunter-gatherers occurred at densities lower than the average for a mammal of our size. Most modern humans, in contrast, concentrate in large cities at densities up to four orders of magnitude greater than hunter-gatherers, yet consume up to two orders of magnitude more energy per capita. Today, cities across the globe flux greater energy than net primary productivity on a per area basis. This is possible by importing enormous amounts of energy and materials required to sustain hyper-dense, modern humans. The metabolic rift with nature created by modern cities fueled largely by fossil energy poses formidable challenges for establishing a sustainable relationship on a rapidly urbanizing, yet finite planet.

Highlights

  • IntroductionLike all organisms, are subject to fundamental biophysical laws. Van Valen predicted that, because of zero-sum dynamics, all populations of all species in a given environment flux the same amount of energy on average

  • Humans, like all organisms, are subject to fundamental biophysical laws

  • Modern city dwellers occur at densities that are four orders of magnitude greater than hunter-gatherers and other land mammals (Fig. 1; Table S1) even though they consume one to two-orders of magnitude greater energy per capita

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Like all organisms, are subject to fundamental biophysical laws. Van Valen predicted that, because of zero-sum dynamics, all populations of all species in a given environment flux the same amount of energy on average. Allometric parameters (i.e., intercept and slope) can be predicted theoretically and evaluated empirically to form a quantitative framework to carry out meaningful comparisons across scales from cells and organisms[3] to human societies[4,5]. Using this framework as a reference we aimed to understand unique aspects of human ecology and to quantify the extent to which the human species has departed from the energetic constraints that keep all other species in check. The maximum number of individuals per unit area (Dmax), scales as the inverse of individual energy demands[6,7]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call