Abstract

Diagnosing a shift to a maize-dominant diet, on the basis of recognition of high population frequencies of porotic hyperostosis, has unfortunately entered the “collective consciousness” of anthropology—because of the mythology that iron deficiency is a common cause of that phenomenon. Skull changes in patients with all forms (both primary and secondary) of iron deficiency are actually extremely rare (0.68%!). That frequency certainly does not support iron deficiency as the explanation for the high frequency of porotic hyperostosis noted (approximating 50%) in some populations. Isotopic analysis further reveals that C4 grasses (e.g., maize) actually did not become a significant part of North American human diets until the past 1000 years, long after notation of high frequency porotic hyperostosis. This further falsifies claims of earlier maize diets (predicated on frequency of porotic hyperostosis) and negates the perception that maize-induced iron deficiency is the cause of porotic hyperostosis. The latter speculation is not only con- trary to medical evidence, but that misdirection gave false impressions of ancient populations/civilizations and compromised use of a valuable observation. That mythology must be extirpated from the “collective consciousness”. Perhaps now attention can be appropriately directed to exploration of genetic hemolytic anemia, hemoglobinopathies and parasitic infestations which are known causes of porotic hyperostosis.

Highlights

  • This editorial makes recommendation for deletion of the mythology that maize consumption is the dietary implication of porotic hyperostosis

  • The mythology appears embedded in anthropology’s “collective consciousness” (Angel, 1978; El-Najjar et al, 1975; Grmek, 1989; Hill & Armelagos, 1990; Von Endt & Ortner, 1982)

  • Even the diagnosis of primary iron deficiency is questioned in those cases

Read more

Summary

The Importance of Scientific Methodology

This editorial makes recommendation for deletion of the mythology that maize consumption is the dietary implication of porotic hyperostosis. The mythology (that primary iron deficiency is the cause of porotic hyperostosis) appears embedded in anthropology’s “collective consciousness” (Angel, 1978; El-Najjar et al, 1975; Grmek, 1989; Hill & Armelagos, 1990; Von Endt & Ortner, 1982). This persistence needs to be reexamined in view of the observations by Claude Bernard and Will Rogers that it is not what we don’t know that gets us into trouble, so much as what we know that ain’t so (Spodick, 1975). While “elders” should be respected, it is unclear that their pronouncements should be blindly followed?

Primary Iron Deficiency Does Not Cause Porotic Hyperostosis
Analysis of Skull Pathology
Cribra Orbitalia Is a Separate Phenomenon from Porotic Hyperostosis
What then Is the Significance of Porotic Hyperostosis?
Findings
Eliminating Mythology
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call