Abstract
At the Paris Climate Summit in 2015, then Colombian president Juan Manuel Santos proposed constructing a multi-national biodiversity corridor that would extend from the Andes to the Brazilian Atlantic coast. Santos highlighted increased militarization of the territory as one advantage of the corridor. In this model, ecological conservation becomes a matter of national/natural security, in the form of counterinsurgency to counter illegal economies. Climate change and ecological disaster mean the forest needs the military power of the State to save it from destruction. We argue that such conservation entails a form of necropolitics lying in wait; because to conserve one part is to condemn the other – framed as the enemy – to certain destruction, as land is simultaneously designated for large-scale development projects. Conservation, in effect, becomes tied to a form of extinction. Our article examines two increasingly militarized frontiers that work through conservation in Colombia. The first is where the Andes meets the Amazon rainforest, an area that has seen an increase in deforestation following the 2016 Peace Agreement with the FARC. Deforestation is often attributed to the cultivation of coca (used to produce cocaine), and the solution posited by the government is to eradicate the plant. We argue that eradication of illicit crops is a form of enforced extinction that militarizes the forest, targeting both human and non-human inhabitants. The second frontier concerns coal mining on the Caribbean coast, where mass environmental devastation induced by the industry has led to a forced reorganization of life in the region. The military guards the sites of extraction and those who oppose coal mining become targets for elimination. We bring these two cases – coal and coca – into dialogue, to trace the extinction-driven expansion of extractive economies, a process intertwined with armed conflict, narcotrafficking, and now with transitional politics.
Highlights
At the Paris Climate Summit in 2015, Colombian president Juan Manuel Santos proposed constructing a multi-national biodiversity corridor that would extend from the Andes to the Brazilian Atlantic coast
We focus on what these scenarios mean for relations between environmental conservation and militarization
Within conceptions of nature and transitional justice we witness the Colombian state continuously reifying nature as an economic resource, reinforced by processes of militarization and public policymaking that decide what is worthy of conservation and what should be left to die and go extinct, a process we conceptualize as 'necropolitics' (Mbembe 2003)
Summary
In 2016, the government of Juan Manuel Santos signed the peace accords with the Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia (FARC), the oldest guerrilla movement on the continent. Within conceptions of nature and transitional justice we witness the Colombian state continuously reifying nature as an economic resource, reinforced by processes of militarization and public policymaking that decide what is worthy of conservation and what should be left to die and go extinct, a process we conceptualize as 'necropolitics' (Mbembe 2003). There is an idea that conservation via eradication of the plant would uphold peace, and with coal, that more extraction (entailing an eradication of other forms of life to make way for mining and associated infrastructure) would secure a more peaceful future In these two examples, eradication is tied to the idea of conservation and produces a very specific condition: the militarization of nature and the production of enmity. We tell the story of how each economy unfolded in the environment, and how this environment became the medium and mode through which violence was perpetuated
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
