Abstract
The necessity of Net Neutrality (NN) rules to safeguard the open internet should be assessed in light of the history of broadband internet and empirical evidence. Actual or alleged “net neutrality breaches” have been marginal. The existence of strong positive externalities between internet Contents & Applications (C&A) and the requirement of compatibility of the C&A – network nterfaces to support those externalities imply that network operators have incentives to provide high quality open internet access based on a neutral network. This is not incompatible with offering in parallel and as complement specific C&As relying on proprietary information and using a priority access to the network (so-called “specialized services”). The specific nature of such C&As implies that they cannot represent substitutes to services available on internet access. The access provider is incentivized to provide an internet access service of good quality even if provides specialised service in parallel and as complement, because the former largely determines the value of the access service for the end-user. Such findings on the incentives of network providers should be taken into account when interpreting and assessing the Net neutrality rules.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.