Abstract

BackgroundType 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), a highly prevalent chronic disease, puts a large burden on individual health and health care systems. Computer simulation models, used to evaluate the clinical and economic effectiveness of various interventions to handle T2DM, have become a well-established tool in diabetes research. Despite the broad consensus about the general importance of validation, especially external validation, as a crucial instrument of assessing and controlling for the quality of these models, there are no systematic reviews comparing such validation of diabetes models. As a result, the main objectives of this systematic review are to identify and appraise the different approaches used for the external validation of existing models covering the development and progression of T2DM.MethodsWe will perform adapted searches by applying respective search strategies to identify suitable studies from 14 electronic databases. Retrieved study records will be included or excluded based on predefined eligibility criteria as defined in this protocol. Among others, a publication filter will exclude studies published before 1995. We will run abstract and full text screenings and then extract data from all selected studies by filling in a predefined data extraction spreadsheet. We will undertake a descriptive, narrative synthesis of findings to address the study objectives. We will pay special attention to aspects of quality of these models in regard to the external validation based upon ISPOR and ADA recommendations as well as Mount Hood Challenge reports. All critical stages within the screening, data extraction and synthesis processes will be conducted by at least two authors. This protocol adheres to PRISMA and PRISMA-P standards.DiscussionThe proposed systematic review will provide a broad overview of the current practice in the external validation of models with respect to T2DM incidence and progression in humans built on simulation techniques.Systematic review registrationPROSPERO CRD42017069983.

Highlights

  • RationaleDescribe the rationale for the review in theSee pages 2 and 4, Section: Background context of what is already known and Study objectives and rationale

  • While there is a spectrum of metabolic disorders under the label ‘diabetes’, the majority of cases (90 to 95% [2]) may be classified as type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)

  • Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a chronic condition that may often remain undiagnosed over several years

Read more

Summary

Introduction

RationaleDescribe the rationale for the review in theSee pages 2 and 4, Section: Background context of what is already known and Study objectives and rationale. The main objectives of this systematic review are to identify and appraise the different approaches used for the external validation of existing models covering the development and progression of T2DM. Diabetes mellitus (DM), characterised by increased blood glucose concentration, is a major health care challenge: more than 415 million adults (20–79 years old), or 8.8% in the given age group, were living with this chronic condition in 2015 according to the latest estimates of the International Diabetes Federation (IDF). This figure, even by conservative projections, will reach 642 million in 2040 [1]. Final stage complications such as blindness, limb amputation, renal failure, stroke or myocardial infraction result in high health care expenditures and loss of healthy life years that put an unstringed burden on a patient’s health and the health care system in general [5]

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call