Abstract
We study the effects of multi-layered governance on firm risk by focusing on the interaction of two types of career concerns. Two Delaware court decisions, the validation of poison pill defenses (the Unitrin decision) implemented by staggered boards (the Wallace decision), reduced takeover-related career concerns. CEO age influences the response of Delaware firms to these shocks. Older CEOs in newly insulated firms reduce risk, while their younger counterparts increase risk. Ex-post, the differential behavior among young Delaware CEOs appears to be rewarded with abnormally positive stock performance and better future career outcomes. We conclude that there is important variation in the effects of governance on firm (CEO) behavior, driven by multiple facets of career concerns.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
