Abstract

BackgroundFacilitation is a key strategy that may contribute to successful implementation of healthcare innovations. In blended facilitation, external facilitators (EFs) guide and support internal facilitators (IFs) in directing implementation processes. Developers of the i-PARIHS framework propose that successful facilitation requires project management, team/process, and influencing/negotiating skills. It is unclear what IF skills are most important in real-world settings, which could inform recruitment and training efforts. As prior qualitative studies of IF skills have only interviewed IFs, the perspectives of their EF partners are needed. Furthermore, little is known regarding the distribution of implementation tasks between IFs and EFs, which could impact sustainability once external support is removed. In the context of an implementation trial, we therefore: 1) evaluated IFs’ use of i-PARIHS facilitation skills, from EFs’ perspectives; 2) identified attributes of IFs not encompassed within the i-PARIHS skills; and 3) investigated the relative contributions of IFs and EFs during facilitation.MethodsAnalyses were conducted within a hybrid type II trial utilizing blended facilitation to implement the collaborative chronic care model within mental health teams of nine VA medical centers. Each site committed one team and an IF to weekly process design meetings and additional implementation activities over 12 months. Three EFs worked with three sites each. Following study completion, the EFs completed semi-structured qualitative interviews reflecting on the facilitation process, informed by the i-PARIHS facilitation skill areas. Interviews were analyzed via directed content analysis.ResultsEFs emphasized the importance of IFs having strong project management, team/process, and influencing/negotiating skills. Prior experience in these areas and a mental health background were also benefits. Personal characteristics (e.g., flexible, assertive) were described as critical, particularly when faced with conflict. EFs discussed the importance of clear delineation of EF/IF roles, and the need to shift facilitation responsibilities to IFs.ConclusionsKey IF skills, according to EFs, are aligned with i-PARIHS recommendations, but IFs’ personal characteristics were also emphasized as important factors. Findings highlight traits to consider when selecting IFs and potential training areas (e.g., conflict management). EFs and IFs must determine an appropriate distribution of facilitation tasks to ensure long-term sustainability of practices.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov, September 7, 2015, #NCT02543840.

Highlights

  • Facilitation is a key strategy that may contribute to successful implementation of healthcare innovations

  • External facilitator (EF) and Internal facilitator (IF) must determine an appropriate distribution of facilitation tasks to ensure long-term sustainability of practices

  • We present findings within the five assessed areas below: project management and improvement skills; team and process skills; influencing and negotiating skills; personal characteristics; and EF/IF dynamics

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Facilitation is a key strategy that may contribute to successful implementation of healthcare innovations. Developers of the i-PARIHS framework propose that successful facilitation requires project management, team/ process, and influencing/negotiating skills. It is unclear what IF skills are most important in real-world settings, which could inform recruitment and training efforts. The iPARIHS framework proposes that successful implementation is the result of facilitation of the innovation among its identified recipients, occurring within the local, organizational, and external context [4]. Facilitation is referred to as the “active ingredient” within the i-PARIHS framework, in that it is responsible for providing implementation strategies and actions that are tailored to the innovation, recipients, and context [4]. The current study focuses on this construct of facilitation, given its central role in influencing implementation outcomes

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call