Abstract

The external costs derived from the environmental impacts of electricity generation can be significant and should not be underrated, as their consideration can be useful to establish a ranking between different electricity generation sources to inform decision-makers. The aim of this research is to transparently evaluate the recent external cost of electricity generation in G20 countries using a global life-cycle impact-assessment (LCIA) method: life cycle impact assessment method based on endpoint modeling (LIME3). The weighting factors developed in the LIME3 method for each G20 country enable one to convert the different environmental impacts (not only climate change and air pollution) resulting from the emissions and resources consumption during the full lifecycle of electricity generation—from resource extraction to electricity generation—into a monetary value. Moreover, in LIME3, not only the weighting factors are developed for each G20 country but also all the impact categories. Using this method, it was possible to determine accurately which resources or emission had an environmental impact in each country. This study shows that the countries relying heavily on coal, such as India (0.172 $/kWh) or Indonesia (0.135 $/kWh) have the highest external costs inside the G20, with air pollution and climate accounting together for more than 80% of the costs. In these two countries, the ratio of the external cost/market price was the highest in the G20, at 2.3 and 1.7, respectively. On the other hand, countries with a higher reliance on renewable energies, such as Canada (0.008 $/kWh) or Brazil (0.012 $/kWh) have lower induced costs. When comparing with the market price, it has to be noted also that for instance Canada is able to generate cheap electricity with a low-external cost. For most of the other G20 countries, this cost was estimated at between about 0.020$ and 0.040 $/kWh. By estimating the external cost of each electricity generation technology available in each G20 country, this study also highlighted that sometimes the external cost of the electricity generated from one specific technology can be significant even when using renewables due to resource scarcity—for example, the 0.068 $/kWh of electricity generated from hydropower in India. This information, missing from most previous studies, should not be omitted by decision makers when considering which type of electricity generation source to prioritize.

Highlights

  • The management of energy systems has become a progressively more important topic in recent years

  • Technology (DALY)/kgSO2, and the economic-value conversion factor in $/disability-adjusted life year (DALY); the integration factor can find an explanation for the external cost of electricity for the G20 country power generation beTo directly expressed in $/kg mix, it was necessary to evaluate the impact technology for each based country

  • The aim of this research was to evaluate the external cost of electricity generation in G20 countries using the LIME3 global lifecycle impact assessment (LCIA) method

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The management of energy systems has become a progressively more important topic in recent years. Under the growing concern of climate change consequences, decision makers are facing several types of challenges (economic, environmental, and social) to prioritize one source over another. Sustainability 2020, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW. Electricity generation reached 26,615 TWh in 2018 [1], increasing by 3.7% from the previous year, as shown, with around 85% of consumption occurring in G20 countries [2] About 65% of global electricity is generated from fossil fuels (coal, natural gas, and oil). As a Sustainability 2020, 12, 2002 result, combined with heat generation, the electricity sector globally represents 42% of total annual. The heavy use of fossil-based sources, coal, has an impact airborne-substance CO2 emissions, with China (34%), the USA (13%), and India (8%) accounting for the highest share [3].

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.