Abstract

Intraventricular hemorrhage is a severe subtype of intracerebral hemorrhage associated with high mortality and poor outcome. We analyzed various intraventricular hemorrhage scores at baseline to find common parameters associated with increased mortality. Consecutive intracerebral hemorrhage patients treated in Helsinki University Central Hospital during 2005-2010 were included in the Helsinki Intracerebral Hemorrhage Study registry and analyzed for three-month mortality. After excluding lost-to-follow-up patients, 967 intracerebral hemorrhage patients were included, out of whom 398 (41%) had intraventricular hemorrhage. Intraventricular hemorrhage patients, compared with nonintraventricular hemorrhage patients, had lower baseline Glasgow Coma Scale [median 12 (IQR 6-15) vs. 15 (13-15); P < 0.001] and higher National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [18 (10-27) vs. 7 (3-14); P < 0.001] scores; larger intracerebral hemorrhage volumes [17 ml (7.2-42) vs. 6.8 (2.4-18); P < 0.001] and more often hydrocephalus (51% vs. 9%; P < 0.001); and higher mortality rates (54% vs. 18%; P < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, the presence of intraventricular hemorrhage was independently associated with mortality [OR 2.05 (95% CI 1.36-3.09)] when adjusted for well-known prognostic factors of intracerebral hemorrhage, i.e. age, gender, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, intracerebral hemorrhage volume, infratentorial location, and etiology. The presence of intraventricular hemorrhage was independently associated with increased mortality, and all the intraventricular hemorrhage scores were strong predictors of three-month mortality.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.