Abstract

The extent and stage of breast cancer at initial presentation determines treatment options and prognosis. Pre-operative disease extent is determined by mammography and image guided biopsy, although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may show further multifocal or multicentric disease. Histological assessment will give tumour size, type, grade, hormone receptor status and the presence of vascular invasion; however, a variety of imaging techniques can contribute to this information and perhaps give an in vivo functional assessment of tumour physiology. Lymph node involvement has been shown to have important prognostic status and is assessed by surgery or sentinel node biopsy. Ultrasound, MRI and nuclear medicine techniques, including positron emission tomography (PET), give variable results in the assessment of the axilla. Clinical assessment of tumour response in the neo-adjuvant setting is unreliable and imaging can more accurately measure tumour size and residual disease. The contribution of mammography, ultrasound and MRI will be discussed together with a review of the potential contribution of the less commonly used nuclear medicine techniques and PET. The functional imaging techniques are being explored and may be used in the future to tailor patient management, particularly in the use of chemotherapy.

Highlights

  • Histological analysis of core biopsy of breast lesions takes a minimum of 24 h, but imprint cytology of a core biopsy can be reported within an hour

  • A total of 450,425 women were screened by BreastScreen Western Australia (BSWA) from January 1990 to December 2000. 2,314 cancers were detected with a total cancer detection rate of 5.1 cancers per 1,000 women screened. 4,916 women of ATSI origin were screened during this interval. 31 breast cancers were diagnosed, with a total cancer detection rate of 6.3 cancers per 1,000 women screened

  • These lesions may mimic the microcalcifications of ductal carcinoma in situ at screening mammography

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Histological analysis of core biopsy of breast lesions takes a minimum of 24 h, but imprint cytology of a core biopsy can be reported within an hour. This study validates the accuracy of imprint cytology from core biopsy of breast lesions obtained under ultrasound control. Full field digital mammography (FFDM) seems set to replace conventional film-screen technique. Concern has been raised over FFDM diminished spatial resolution (5ā€“6 Ip/mm). If valid, this could compromise detection of calcification and diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). In our centre we were not able to perceive any difference between microfocus magnification and on-screen magnification when assessing microcalcification. We subsequently compared these results with average scores for over 90 film-screen mammography systems

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call