Abstract

The indisputable wide use of the Eddy Dissipation Concept (EDC) implies that the resulting mean reaction rate is reasonably well modeled. To model turbulent combustions, an amount of EDC constants that differ from the original values was proposed. However, most of them were used without following the nature of the model or considering the effects of the modification. Starting with the energy cascade and the EDC models, the exact original primary and secondary constants are deduced in detail in this work. The mean reaction rate is then formulated from the primary constants or the secondary constants. Based on the physical meaning of fine structures, the limits of the EDC constants are presented and can be used to direct the EDC constant modifications. The effects of the secondary constant on the mean reaction rate are presented and the limiting turbulence Reynolds number used for the validity of EDC is discussed. To show the effects of the constants of the EDC model on the mean reaction rate, 20 combinations of the primary constants are used to simulate a laboratory-scale turbulent jet flame, i.e., Sandia Flame D. After a thorough and careful comparison with experiments, case 8, with a secondary constant of 6 and primary constants of 0.1357 and 0.11, can aptly reproduce this flame, except for in the over-predicted mean OH mass fraction.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call