Abstract
In this paper we analyze the semantical definition of extensions for open default theories. We argue that this definition reflects the domain closure assumption and show how the domain closure assumption for countable and finite domains can be expressed in first-order default logic extended with the Carnap rule of inference. Also we give examples of the domain dependence of extensions for open default theories. In particular, we show that such extensions do not possess the minimality property.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
