Abstract

Abstract Establishing a rigorous framework for propositional deduction which also agrees with what is termed “commonsense reasoning” poses a difficult challenge. This paper is the first of a two-part effort in considering the issue and proposing (in future Part 2) a particular approach via the use of “second order” probabilities, i.e., distributions of probability measures, as opposed to probability-selection approaches, especially that of maximum entropy and Adams' high probability schemes. In the second order probability approach, usually all probability distributions are assumed a priori to be either equally likely, or more generally, to be distributed via the Dirichlet family, up to the constraints involved in the premise set of the potential deduction considered.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.