Abstract

We recently developed a family of image reconstruction algorithms that look like the emission maximum-likelihood expectation-maximization (ML-EM) algorithm. In this study, we extend these algorithms to Bayesian algorithms. The family of emission-EM-lookalike algorithms utilizes a multiplicative update scheme. The extension of these algorithms to Bayesian algorithms is achieved by introducing a new simple factor, which contains the Bayesian information. One of the extended algorithms can be applied to emission tomography and another to transmission tomography. Computer simulations are performed and compared with the corresponding un-extended algorithms. The total-variation norm is employed as the Bayesian constraint in the computer simulations. The newly developed algorithms demonstrate a stable performance. A simple Bayesian algorithm can be derived for any noise variance function. The proposed algorithms have properties such as multiplicative updating, non-negativity, faster convergence rates for bright objects, and ease of implementation. Our algorithms are inspired by Green’s one-step-late algorithm. If written in additive-update form, Green’s algorithm has a step size determined by the future image value, which is an undesirable feature that our algorithms do not have.

Highlights

  • This work is inspired by Green’s one-step-late (OSL) expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm [1, 2]

  • Green’s algorithm became popular because it is user-friendly and easy to implement. It has a wide range of applications, such as in positron emission tomography (PET) and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) [3,4,5,6,7]

  • The main novelty of this study is to propose a general methodology that extends EM-lookalike algorithms into maximum a posterior (MAP) algorithms through a new multiplication factor (1-βU)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This work is inspired by Green’s one-step-late (OSL) expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm [1, 2]. Green’s algorithm became popular because it is user-friendly and easy to implement. It has a wide range of applications, such as in positron emission tomography (PET) and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) [3,4,5,6,7]. Green’s algorithm has applications in other fields, such as the minimization of the penalized I-divergence [8]. Green’s algorithm may diverge [9]. This study improves Green’s algorithm, making it more stable and more applicable for various noise models

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call