Abstract

Background:Although voxel based morphometry studies are still the standard for analyzing brain structure, their dependence on massive univariate inferential methods is a limiting factor. A better understanding of brain pathologies can be achieved by applying inferential multivariate methods, which allow the study of multiple dependent variables, e.g. different imaging modalities of the same subject.Objective:Given the widespread use of SPM software in the brain imaging community, the main aim of this work is the implementation of massive multivariate inferential analysis as a toolbox in this software package. applied to the use of T1 and T2 structural data from diabetic patients and controls. This implementation was compared with the traditional ANCOVA in SPM and a similar multivariate GLM toolbox (MRM).Method:We implemented the new toolbox and tested it by investigating brain alterations on a cohort of twenty-eight type 2 diabetes patients and twenty-six matched healthy controls, using information from both T1 and T2 weighted structural MRI scans, both separately – using standard univariate VBM - and simultaneously, with multivariate analyses.Results:Univariate VBM replicated predominantly bilateral changes in basal ganglia and insular regions in type 2 diabetes patients. On the other hand, multivariate analyses replicated key findings of univariate results, while also revealing the thalami as additional foci of pathology.Conclusion:While the presented algorithm must be further optimized, the proposed toolbox is the first implementation of multivariate statistics in SPM8 as a user-friendly toolbox, which shows great potential and is ready to be validated in other clinical cohorts and modalities.

Highlights

  • The understanding of the brain and related pathologies is hardly tackled when using a single neuroimaging modality, such as T1 magnet resonance (MR) imaging in volumetric studies or positron emission tomography (PET) in1874-4400/17 2017 Bentham OpenExtending Inferential Group Analysis in Type 2 Diabetic PatientsThe Open Neuroimaging Journal, 2017, Volume 11 33 metabolic and neurochemical studies

  • The underlying statistics rely on using particular cases of the univariate General Linear Model (GLM), which lies at the basis of the statistical parametric maps yielded by testing hypothesis on regionally specific effects in neuroimaging data [3]

  • Focusing solely on inferential voxel-wise analyses rather than pattern recognition, this study presents a mass multivariate GLM method that is a natural extension of the mass univariate GLM approach used in voxel based morphometry (VBM) studies

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The understanding of the brain and related pathologies is hardly tackled when using a single neuroimaging modality, such as T1 magnet resonance (MR) imaging in volumetric studies or positron emission tomography (PET) in1874-4400/17 2017 Bentham OpenExtending Inferential Group Analysis in Type 2 Diabetic PatientsThe Open Neuroimaging Journal, 2017, Volume 11 33 metabolic and neurochemical studies. The underlying statistics rely on using particular cases of the univariate General Linear Model (GLM), which lies at the basis of the statistical parametric maps yielded by testing hypothesis on regionally specific effects in neuroimaging data [3]. These univariate methods have been fundamental tools in modern neuroimaging, it is accepted that the presence of multivariate relationships between different brain regions, coupled with information provided by distinct imaging modalities in any single region, might not be explained by univariate analyses alone [2, 4, 5]. A better understanding of brain pathologies can be achieved by applying inferential multivariate methods, which allow the study of multiple dependent variables, e.g. different imaging modalities of the same subject

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call