Extended Producer Responsibility in the Australian Construction Industry

Salman Shooshtarian,Peter Sp Wong,Malik Khalfan,Rebecca J Yang,Tayyab Maqsood

doi:10.3390/su13020620

Salman Shooshtarian, Peter Sp Wong + Show 3 more

Open Access

https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020620

Copy DOI

Journal: Sustainability	Publication Date: Jan 11, 2021
Citations: 30	License type: CC BY 4.0

Affiliation: RMIT University

Abstract

With the COVID-19 outbreak across the world, policymakers and authorities have realised that they cannot solve the emerging issues using conventional policies and practices. COVID-19 has severely affected many industries, including construction and demolition (C&D) waste management and C&D waste resource recovery sector. Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) and schemes alike are policy instruments that prevent waste generation and promote a circular economy in the construction industry. These schemes are long adopted in various countries for different waste streams. EPR policy development and implementation, particularly for C&D waste, is still at an early stage in Australia. This study aims to review the Australian regulatory environment and practice to identify barriers and enablers towards successful policy development and implementation of C&D waste-related EPR. This study is based on secondary data that are publicly available. The document analysis was conducted to identify the level of regulatory and other stakeholders support in Australia. Following three rounds of examination of sources and applying multiple selection criteria, 59 different sources were reviewed in total. The results showed that there is widespread support among different stakeholders to develop EPR and expand the existing regulation to other materials. The barriers were cost and time implications for EPR policy establishment and enforcement, diversity of stakeholders involved, construction product lifecycle, responsibility of manufacturers, complexity in implantation of EPR regulations, modification inbuilt facilities and health and safety issues. Recommendations are made to alleviate these challenges. The outcome of this study could serve as a guideline for designing effective EPR policies.

Highlights

Management of construction and demolition (C&D) waste has become a priority in many developed and developing countries
The development of Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) and other similar policies is not straightforward due to the complexities and wide range of stakeholders involved in product production, trade, delivery, consumption and waste management [34]
Australia has set ambitious waste management targets, and EPR plays an important role in achieving these targets

Summary

Introduction

Management of construction and demolition (C&D) waste has become a priority in many developed and developing countries. Several models have been proposed to address these consequences through integrated and effective management plans. Many research studies demonstrated that an integrated and effective waste management system should consist of the following three components: encouragement (e.g., education, green rating systems), enforcement (e.g., landfill levy, illegal dumping penalty) and prevention (e.g., design waste out, extended producer responsibility) [1,2,3,4,5]. To ensure that a balanced waste management plan is considered and all stakeholders are given a level playing field, these three components should be applied concurrently. COVID-19 has severely affected many businesses involved in construction and Sustainability 2021, 13, 620.

Objectives

Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusion