Abstract
The scientific approach is directed towards addressing the evolution of the modern criminal process, which has begun to integrate priorities such as interest and efficiency at the expense of other traditional values, such as finding out of the truth. In this context, negotiated justice, although it seems to neglect certain principles such as adversarial proceedings, is becoming increasingly common, as it simplifies and speeds up criminal procedures. On the other hand, failing to recover the proceeds of crime or assets resulting from a criminal activity and leaving them to the perpetrator would be tantamount to ignoring the purpose of the criminal process to protect the individual, society and the state from crime. The study focuses on assessing the compatibility of the extended confiscation with these procedures, examining the existing legal framework and proposing solutions for its improvement.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Studia Universitatis Moldaviae. Seria Stiinte Sociale
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
