Abstract
Summary Most reported carbon storage projects have involved inexpensive carbon dioxide (CO2) capture from gas processing plants or ethanol refineries. However, widespread carbon capture and storage (CCS) application must avoid any risk that high capital investment cost for carbon capture from stationary point sources leads to unanticipated issues related to the aquifer storage. This paper reviews successful and unsuccessful carbon storage projects and explains simple extended aquifer system fundamentals that must be considered in selecting a storage aquifer. This study begins by evaluating reported carbon storage projects in the context of an extended aquifer system with specific attention to initial formation pore pressure and potential or known hydraulic vertical or lateral communication with hydrocarbon accumulations and/or fresh water. Further study focuses on how the contrast between injection well and aquifer pressure evolution enables understanding of the overall aquifer material balance. Finally, we consider implications of brine migration during and after long-term CO2 injection in unconfined aquifers. Experience in the petroleum industry with aquifer behavior includes presence or lack of water influx and production from hydrocarbon reservoirs that share a common aquifer. Of particular importance is the observation that hydrostatic initial formation pressure indicates the possibility that a petroleum system, or an extended aquifer system without hydrocarbon accumulation(s), connects to atmospheric pressure through an unconfined aquifer. In such cases, indefinite injection will never increase the regional aquifer pressure. Furthermore, initial formation pressure that exceeds hydrostatic pressure implies a petroleum system or an extended aquifer system that is volumetrically limited. In such cases, injection will increase the system pressure, and pressure monitoring can detect leakage from the system. Finally, CO2 injection into an aquifer will displace brine in the direction of lower pressure that could relate to distant production from the same aquifer or from hydrocarbon reservoirs with which it communicates. Reasons for known carbon storage project interruptions have included unexpected lateral plume migration or aquifer pressure increase during CO2 injection that might have been anticipated with attention to straightforward consideration of aquifer-enabled hydraulic communication. Such extended aquifer dynamics must be included in long-term models for permanent CO2 storage during and after injection.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
