Abstract

The sesquiterpenoid juvenile hormone (JH) is vital to insect development and reproduction. Intracellular JH receptors have recently been established as basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor (bHLH)/PAS proteins in Drosophila melanogaster known as germ cell–expressed (Gce) and its duplicate paralog, methoprene-tolerant (Met). Upon binding JH, Gce/Met activates its target genes. Insects possess multiple native JH homologs whose molecular activities remain unexplored, and diverse synthetic compounds including insecticides exert JH-like effects. How the JH receptor recognizes its ligands is unknown. To determine which structural features define an active JH receptor agonist, we tested several native JHs and their nonnative geometric and optical isomers for the ability to bind the Drosophila JH receptor Gce, to induce Gce-dependent transcription, and to affect the development of the fly. Our results revealed high ligand stereoselectivity of the receptor. The geometry of the JH skeleton, dictated by two stereogenic double bonds, was the most critical feature followed by the presence of an epoxide moiety at a terminal position. The optical isomerism at carbon C11 proved less important even though Gce preferentially bound a natural JH enantiomer. The results of receptor-ligand–binding and cell-based gene activation assays tightly correlated with the ability of different geometric JH isomers to induce gene expression and morphogenetic effects in the developing insects. Molecular modeling supported the requirement for the proper double-bond geometry of JH, which appears to be its major selective mechanism. The strict stereoselectivity of Gce toward the natural hormone contrasts with the high potency of synthetic Gce agonists of disparate chemistries.

Highlights

  • The sesquiterpenoid juvenile hormone (JH) is vital to insect development and reproduction

  • Using a Drosophila Schneider 2 (S2) cell line, we have previously shown that methyl farnesoate (MF) and JH III induce a JH-responsive luciferase (JHRE-luc) reporter in a manner dependent on binding to the endogenous JH receptor germ cell– expressed (Gce) [6]

  • We tested the hormones using an independent two-hybrid assay in a human (HEK293T) cell line where ligand binding to Gce is estimated from JH-dependent interaction between Gce and its partner protein, Tai [48]

Read more

Summary

The abbreviations used are

20E, 20-hydroxyecdysone; JH, juvenile hormone; JHRE, JH response element; JHB3, JH III bisepoxide; MF, methyl farnesoate; Gce, germ cell– expressed; Met, methoprene-tolerant; Tai, Taiman; Kr-h1, Krüppel homolog 1; bHLH-PAS, basic helix-loop-helix/PerArnt-Sim; hJHBP, hemolymph JH-binding protein; MMGBSA, molecular mechanics, the generalized Born model and solvent accessibility; JHRE-luc, JH-responsive luciferase; EC50, effective concentration; Ki, inhibition constant; mJHBP, mosquito juvenile hormone-binding protein; DCC, dextrancoated charcoal; S2, Schneider 2; rp, ribosomal protein 49; qRT-PCR, quantitative RT-PCR. Moth, and heteropteran species generally concluded that the native spatial conformation of JH I was the most potent conformation and that the geometric isomerism had a great impact on the biological activity, whereas the chirality at C10 and C11 was less critical These pharmacological data essentially corresponded to later studies on binding of the JH I and JH III stereoisomers to the hemolymph JH-binding proteins (hJHBPs) from several moth species [41,42,43,44,45,46]. Having established the intracellular JH receptor Met/Gce [5, 6], we are in a position to address the long-standing questions regarding JH agonist selectivity To this end, we have assessed diverse native JHs, their optical and geometric isomers, and two chemically unrelated JH mimics for their effects on the ligand–receptor interaction, transcriptional activation in a cell-based system and in vivo, and Drosophila development. Our findings reveal high ligand stereoselectivity of the JH receptor Gce, which contrasts with the disparate chemistry of highly potent synthetic JH mimics

Results
Discussion
Experimental procedures
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.