Abstract
A characterization of the distinctive features of expressions and confessions of intention is now in order. Two kinds of cases are prominent. First, there are those in which an agent expresses, avows or accepts a further intention in acting. Anscombe’s example remains useful: In operating a pump a man may be replenishing a water supply, and while it is true that the supply of water is being replenished, he is up to poisoning the inhabitants whose water it is, since he is pumping water with the further intention of poisoning the inhabitants. Or, another case of the same kind, in speaking to another person, one may be offending him, or although he was offended, the speaker only had in mind giving him some information. The man poisoning the inhabitants or giving some information may express, confess, avow, acknowledge or accept the attribution of such an intention; his language, if he uses any, will typically have a past reference, ‘I did it (was doing it) to poison them,’ or ‘I said it to inform him.’ Expressions of intention are used here to explain what was done, to put the agent’s truthful view of it in the right light. Truthfulness here depends on the fact that the agent intended to do what he now expresses as the intention with which he acted.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.