Abstract

We have analyzed expression of anti-HIV-1 hammerhead ribozymes in the context of retroviral vectors. To determine optimal vector designs for ribozyme expression, we compared three vectors, each of which contained the same pair of anti-HIV-1 hammerhead ribozymes in tandem. Despite the presence of vastly different amounts of vector-derived flanking sequences, the ribozymes produced by each vector had similar cleavage activity when assayed in vitro. The ribozyme vectors were packaged into amphotropic virion and used to transduce human CEM T lymphocytes. Analysis by Northern blot and RNAse protection assays demonstrated that the highest steady-state levels of ribozyme-containing transcripts were produced by a vector in which the ribozymes were expressed under transcriptional control of the vector MoMuLV LTR. Despite these differences in the levels of ribozyme transcripts achieved by the vectors, their ability to confer resistance to HIV-1 replication was similar. Therefore, other factors than the absolute levels of ribozymes play a role in determining the effectiveness of ribozyme vectors to inhibit HIV-1. These may include structural features of the transcripts that affect the antisense effects of the ribozyme constructs, the actual catalytic activity of the ribozymes, their RNA folding, the binding of proteins, and the intracellular localization. Greater understanding of these factors may permit more effective application of ribozymes to inhibit gene expression.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.