Abstract

e21151 Background: The distinction between malignant and benign lesions of the thyroid gland often requires histological demonstration, once the fine-needle aspiration biopsy method applied pre-operatively has some limitations. In an attempt to improve diagnostic accuracy, markers have been studied by immunocyto- and immunohistochemistry techniques, mainly cytokeratin-19 (CK-19), galectin-3 (Gal-3) and Hector Battifora mesothelial-1 (HBME-1). However, current results remain controversial. The aim of the present article was to establish the diagnostic accuracy of CK-19, Gal-3 and HBME-1 markers, as well as their associations, in the differentiation of malignant and benign thyroid lesions. Methods: A systematic review of MEDLINE’s published articles was performed. After establishing the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 65 articles were selected. The technique of meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy was employed, and global values of sensitivity, specificity, area under the ROC curve (AUC), and diagnostic odds ratio (dOR) were calculated. Results: The positivity ofCK-19 for the diagnosis of malignant thyroid lesions demonstrated sensitivity of 81% (IC95%: 79-83%), specificity of 73% (IC95%: 70-75%), AUC of 87,5% and dOR of 14,7 (IC95%: 8,2-26,4); for Gal-3, sensitivity of 82% (IC95%: 81-84%), specificity of 81% (IC95%: 79-82%), AUC of 90% and dOR of 23,4 (IC95%: 14,0-39,1); and for HBME-1, sensitivity of 77% (IC95%: 76-79%), specificity of 83% (IC95%: 82-85%), AUC of 92,8% and dOR of 41,0 (IC95%: 21,4-78,4). The association of the three markers determined sensitivity of 85% (IC95%: 78-90%), specificity of 97% (IC95%: 90-99%), AUC of 93,3% and dOR of 95,1 (IC95%: 25,2-359,1). Conclusions: The search for new molecular markers must continue in order to enhance the diagnostic accuracy of the differentiation between malignant and benign lesions of the thyroid gland, since the results found still show persistency of false-negative and false-positive tests.

Highlights

  • Thyroid gland carcinoma is a very prevalent neoplasia worldwide

  • A survey sponsored by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2010 revealed that there are around 44,670 new cases and 1,690 deaths caused by this disease every year [1]

  • The majority of malignant lesions of the thyroid, such as papillary carcinoma, medullary carcinoma and undifferentiated histological types, can be diagnosed by cytological criteria using samples obtained by fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) guided by ultrasonography [2]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Thyroid gland carcinoma is a very prevalent neoplasia worldwide. A survey sponsored by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2010 revealed that there are around 44,670 new cases and 1,690 deaths caused by this disease every year [1].The majority of malignant lesions of the thyroid, such as papillary carcinoma, medullary carcinoma and undifferentiated histological types, can be diagnosed by cytological criteria using samples obtained by fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) guided by ultrasonography [2]. To distinguish between malignant and benign lesions histological demonstration is often required for a precise diagnosis. They are cytologically grouped as undetermined tumors or suspected follicular neoplasia [4,5,6,7] and patients often undergo a diagnostic surgical procedure (thyroidectomy) even though the general carcinoma rate of this condition is very low [8]. To distinguish between malignant and benign lesions of the thyroid gland histological demonstration is often required since the fine-needle aspiration biopsy method applied pre-operatively has some limitations. The aim of the present article was to establish the diagnostic accuracy of CK-19, Gal-3 and HBME-1 markers, as well as their associations, in the differentiation of malignant and benign thyroid lesions

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.