Abstract

We recognise familiar faces irrespective of their expression. This ability, crucial for social interactions, is a fundamental feature of face perception. We ask whether this constancy of facial identity may be compromised by changes in expression. This, in turn, addresses the issue of whether facial identity and expression are processed separately or interact. Using an identification task, participants learned the identities of two actors from naturalistic (so-called ambient) face images taken from movies. Training was either with neutral images or their expressive counterparts, perceived expressiveness having been determined experimentally. Expressive training responses were slower and more erroneous than neutral training responses. When tested with novel images of the actors that varied in expressiveness, neutrally trained participants gave slower and less accurate responses to images of high compared with low expressiveness. These findings clearly demonstrate that facial expressions impede the processing and learning of facial identity. Because this expression dependence is consistent with a late bifurcation model of face processing, in which changeable facial aspects and identity are coded in a common framework, it suggests that expressions are a part of facial identity representation.

Highlights

  • We recognise familiar faces irrespective of their expression

  • Constancy of facial identity is a fundamental ability of our face processing system, enabling us to recognise familiar faces over a variety of different appearances (Bruce, 1982)

  • Explaining how identity constancy is achieved has been influential in shaping models of face perception because constancy is determined by the relationship between how we process invariant and changeable aspects of faces: Is their processing separate, or separable? The polar positions in this debate are, on the one hand, dual-route theories that advocate functionally independent processing (e.g. Bruce & Young, 1986; Haxby, Hoffman, & Gobbini, 2002, 2000); and on the other hand, models proposing that the streams processing invariant and changeable face aspects bifurcate at a later stage (e.g. Calder, 2011)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

We recognise familiar faces irrespective of their expression. This ability, crucial for social interactions, is a fundamental feature of face perception. When tested with novel images of the actors that varied in expressiveness, neutrally trained participants gave slower and less accurate responses to images of high compared with low expressiveness These findings clearly demonstrate that facial expressions impede the processing and learning of facial identity. Constancy of facial identity is a fundamental ability of our face processing system, enabling us to recognise familiar faces over a variety of different appearances (Bruce, 1982). Late bifurcation models thereby permit that expressions can be a part of facial identity and can predict the interaction of these facial properties They suggest that we are able to process identity and changeable aspects separately, but that interactions between the two may arise (Calder, 2011). Dual-route theories do not readily predict such interactions

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.