Abstract

BackgroundIn predictive spatial cueing studies, reaction times (RT) are shorter for targets appearing at cued locations (valid trials) than at other locations (invalid trials). An increase in the amplitude of early P1 and/or N1 event-related potential (ERP) components is also present for items appearing at cued locations, reflecting early attentional sensory gain control mechanisms. However, it is still unknown at which stage in the processing stream these early amplitude effects are translated into latency effects.Methodology/Principal FindingsHere, we measured the latency of two ERP components, the N2pc and the sustained posterior contralateral negativity (SPCN), to evaluate whether visual selection (as indexed by the N2pc) and visual-short term memory processes (as indexed by the SPCN) are delayed in invalid trials compared to valid trials. The P1 was larger contralateral to the cued side, indicating that attention was deployed to the cued location prior to the target onset. Despite these early amplitude effects, the N2pc onset latency was unaffected by cue validity, indicating an express, quasi-instantaneous re-engagement of attention in invalid trials. In contrast, latency effects were observed for the SPCN, and these were correlated to the RT effect.Conclusions/SignificanceResults show that latency differences that could explain the RT cueing effects must occur after visual selection processes giving rise to the N2pc, but at or before transfer in visual short-term memory, as reflected by the SPCN, at least in discrimination tasks in which the target is presented concurrently with at least one distractor. Given that the SPCN was previously associated to conscious report, these results further show that entry into consciousness is delayed following invalid cues.

Highlights

  • Visual-spatial attention can be deployed covertly to specific locations in space in absence of head or eye movements

  • Given that the sustained posterior contralateral negativity (SPCN) was previously associated to conscious report, these results further show that entry into consciousness is delayed following invalid cues

  • It is well established that reaction times (RT) are shorter when the target appears at the cued location than when it appears at an uncued location

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Visual-spatial attention can be deployed covertly to specific locations in space in absence of head or eye movements. The stage(s) of target processing that are modulated by predictive cues have been strongly debated Several results, such as the interaction of target luminance with cue validity [2] provided support for an early selection hypothesis, which proposes that the cueing RT effect can be explained by attention-related perceptual facilitation. In predictive spatial cueing studies, reaction times (RT) are shorter for targets appearing at cued locations (valid trials) than at other locations (invalid trials). An increase in the amplitude of early P1 and/or N1 event-related potential (ERP) components is present for items appearing at cued locations, reflecting early attentional sensory gain control mechanisms It is still unknown at which stage in the processing stream these early amplitude effects are translated into latency effects

Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call