Abstract

This paper aimed to quantify exposure-response relationships between the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists' (ACGIH) threshold limit value (TLV) for hand-activity level (HAL) and incidence of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Manufacturing and service workers previously studied by six research institutions had their data combined and re-analyzed. CTS cases were defined by symptoms and abnormal nerve conduction. Hazard ratios (HR) were calculated using proportional hazards regression after adjusting for age, gender, body mass index, and CTS predisposing conditions. The longitudinal study comprised 2751 incident-eligible workers, followed prospectively for up to 6.4 years and contributing 6243 person-years of data. Associations were found between CTS and TLV for HAL both as a continuous variable [HR 1.32 per unit, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.11-1.57] and when categorized using the ACGIH action limit (AL) and TLV. Those between the AL and TLV and above the TLV had HR of 1.7 (95% CI 1.2-2.5) and 1.5 (95% CI 1.0-2.1), respectively. As independent variables (in the same adjusted model) the HR for peak force (PF) and HAL were 1.14 per unit (95% CI 1.05-1.25), and 1.04 per unit (95% CI 0.93-1.15), respectively. Those with exposures above the AL were at increased risk of CTS, but there was no further increase in risk for workers above the TLV. This suggests that the current AL may not be sufficiently protective of workers. Combinations of PF and HAL are useful for predicting risk of CTS.

Highlights

  • Associations were found between carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and threshold limit value (TLV) for hand-activity level (HAL) both as a continuous variable [Hazard ratios (HR) 1.32 per unit, 95% confidence interval 1.11–1.57] and when categorized using the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists’ (ACGIH) action limit (AL) and TLV

  • As independent variables the HR for peak force (PF) and HAL were 1.14 per unit, and 1.04 per unit, respectively

  • Those with exposures above the AL were at increased risk of CTS, but there was no further increase in risk for workers above the TLV

Read more

Summary

Methods

Manufacturing and service workers previously studied by six research institutions had their data combined and re-analyzed. Hazard ratios (HR) were calculated using proportional hazards regression after adjusting for age, gender, body mass index, and CTS predisposing conditions. The analyses presented in this paper were performed as part of a collaborative research project incorporating data from six independently conducted, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) sponsored, prospective cohort studies of risk factors for upper-extremity MSD conducted between 2001–2010 in the US. Raw data were combined from 4123 full-time male and female study participants aged ≥18 and employed by 54 predominantly manufacturing and service companies located in ten US states. The study cohort and data collection methods have been previously described in detail [24, 33].

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call