Abstract

1. Neonicotinoid insecticides are potent neurotoxins of significant economic importance. However, it is clear that their use can adversely impact beneficial insects in the environment, even at low, sub‐lethal doses.2. It has recently been shown that the neonicotinoid imidacloprid disrupts adaptive sex allocation in the parasitoid wasp Nasonia vitripennis (Walker) by limiting their ability to respond to the presence of other females on oviposition patches. In the present study, that work was extended to explore whether sex allocation when superparasitising – laying eggs on a host that has already been parasitised – is also disrupted by imidacloprid.3. Under superparasitism, sex allocation theory predicts that females should vary their offspring sex ratio in relation to their relative clutch size. It was found that sex allocation under superparasitism in Nasonia is disrupted in a dose‐dependent manner, with exposed females producing more daughters.4. Importantly, imidacloprid does not appear to influence the ability of females to estimate the number of eggs already present on a host, suggesting a disassociation between the sex ratio and clutch size cues.5. The present work highlights the fitness costs to beneficial insects of exposure to neonicotinoids, but also provides clues as to how female Nasonia use information when allocating sex.

Highlights

  • Sex allocation theory explains how organisms partition resources into either male or female offspring (Charnov, 1982; West, 2009)

  • Females of the parasitoid wasp Nasonia vitripennis (Walker) allocate offspring sex in line with Local Mate Competition (LMC) theory (Hamilton, 1967); when mating occurs amongst kin, natural selection favours mothers who bias the sex ratio towards their daughters, thereby reducing the level of LMC experienced by their sons

  • We have extended previous research to investigate sex allocation disruption by imidacloprid in a situation where ‘host cues’ as opposed to ‘social cues’ are used by females

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Sex allocation theory explains how organisms partition resources into either male or female offspring (Charnov, 1982; West, 2009). 3. Under superparasitism, sex allocation theory predicts that females should vary their offspring sex ratio in relation to their relative clutch size. It was found that sex allocation under superparasitism in Nasonia is disrupted in a dose-dependent manner, with exposed females producing more daughters.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call